2019 Vacation Reads Part 3: The Dead Student / Murder on the Rockport Limited / Marvel 1602

After keeping up my blogging for a nice streak (I went more than 40 days without missing a one!), going on a vacation with my family gave me a nice excuse to take a break from my reviews. But, of course, it’s vacation, which meant I read…a lot. So over the past few days, I’ve be doing some shorter reviews to catch back up to date on everything I read over vacation (and a couple since then as well.) 

This will be the last of my short capsule review round-ups; after this I plan on returning to my typical-length reviews, including one of Laura Lippman’s new novel and hopefully a couple of others.


9780802123374-340x509John Katzenbach has long been one of those great thriller writers that not enough people know about, and even though his latest, The Dead Student, isn’t among his best works, it’s still a gripping and fun enough read that I feel safe  telling people looking for a beach read that they could do a lot worse. A story that alternates between a long-simmering plot of revenge, a recovering alcoholic trying to uncover the truth of his uncle’s purported suicide, and a young woman recovering from a recent trauma, Katzenbach deliver his usual thrills, all while giving some of his typically engaging and interesting characters.

Admittedly, the plot of The Dead Student is functional, at best (with some detours into silliness toward the end, especially as revolves around a support group’s involvement in things), and that’s a little less typical for Katzenbach, who has given us some fantastic thrillers in recent years (check out his previous nailbiter, Red 1-2-3). The Dead Student works as a nice little piece of noir, with our protagonists crossing line after line as they attempt to pursue the truth, to say nothing of a compelling villain whose methodology and casual demeanor towards it all makes him a great narrator. And if some of the plot details don’t always work as well as you’d hope – the killer’s motivation ends up feeling like we’re missing some key details, the aforementioned support group involvement – somehow, the book manages to keep you reading and enjoying it, even while part of your brain notes the flaws.

No, The Dead Student isn’t among Katzenbach’s best, but it’s still a great, fun little thriller, with twists and turns aplenty and three great main characters, each of whom brings a lot more to the table than the typical generic crime hero or heroine. If you’re looking for a fun beach thriller read, you could do a lot worse, trust me – you’ll have a lot of fun here. But you’d probably have more if you were reading, say, Red 1-2-3 or The Analyst instead. Rating: *** ½


91usz7ubbwlLast year, The Adventure Zone – an RPG podcast hosted by the McElroy brothers and their dad, and my favorite podcast in the world –  made the jump from the audio medium into the world of graphic novels, adapting the first arc of the Balance campaign into the bestselling Here There Be Gerblins. Against all odds, Gerblins was a blast, capturing the goofy spirit of the show while also truly adapting an audio-only, collaborative project into something more streamlined and even coherent. And if there were some little bumps along the way in that adaptation, well, Gerblins was the first arc of the show, and had its own issues, so that was to be expected a bit.

Now comes the second volume of the adaptation, Murder on the Rockport Limited, which finds our brave adventurers infiltrating a train under false pretenses and attempting to not only find a missing artifact, but also solve a murder – or should that be murders, plural? – along the way. It was the first arc of the show that was all truly the McElroys, as Griffin (the DM) made his own story and the rest of the crew started to truly get into their characters, resulting in one of the funniest arcs of the show, as well as introducing some iconic characters for the whole series.

The graphic novel adaptation of Rockport is every bit as good, embracing both the podcast’s jump in quality and the larger sense of the Balance Arc, and finding a great balance between both. While Gerblins occasionally felt like great bits were cut out of the adaptation (understandably, given how tangential they often felt), Rockport feels like it’s much more able to retain a lot of the anarchy of the original series, from the ruthless mocking of a wizardly train attendant to the unexpected appearance of a beloved hotel spokesman to the odd dynamic that arises when three grown men bully an adorable young boy. Having just re-listened to Rockport recently, I can say that this adaptation absolutely captures the spirit of the original story, bringing out the humor of the characters and the McElroy sensibility, all while still making it fit more into the larger shape of the Balance campaign saga. (This last component is in some ways the most interesting thing about the book from the perspective of a TAZ fan, as it allows the story to start bringing out the emotional beats that make all the goofs so special, but they’re hard to talk about in a spoiler-free review.)

I can’t tell you how you’ll feel about Rockport if you’re not already a TAZ fan. Is it accessible to non-fans? Will it make sense if you don’t already love this story? Will you appreciate the cavalcade of in-jokes from MBMBaM and TAZ tossed into the background by artist Carey Pietsch? (Okay, definitely not the last one, but trust me, they’re there, and only add to the evidence of how great of a choice Pietsch is for this project.) But as a long-time fan of the series, Rockport is a ton of fun to read, bringing the arc to life, but more importantly, capturing the spirit of it all wonderfully, and conveying the fun and silliness – and the stakes! – of what the McElroys created. Rating: **** ½


0Neil Gaiman has made a career out of stories – not just telling them, although of course he’s done that too. No, Gaiman has always been fascinated by the power of stories – how they can shape our day to day lives, how they guide us and determine our character, and so much more. So it’s no surprise that his Marvel mini-series Marvel 1602 (with gorgeous illustrations by Andy Kubert and Richard Isanove) deals with stories as well, all arising from a simple “what if?” idea: what if the Marvel universe started not in the mid-twentieth century, but at the beginning of the 1600s?

A fun idea, and for a lot of the length of Marvel 1602, the comic is a treat just to see how Gaiman and company have brought these characters to life in recognizable ways while still making them utterly defined by the time period. We recognize the X-Men, even if they are labeled as creatures of witchcraft and hunted by the Inquisition. We know Nick Fury, even if he’s working as a spymaster of sorts for Queen Elizabeth and the idea of “S.H.I.E.L.D.” doesn’t even exist. The blind bard who’s more than capable of handling himself without vision? We know him, too, even if the comic never explicitly calls him Daredevil. Again and again, Gaiman illustrates our knowledge and familiarity with these characters by seeing how much he can change them and yet leave them the same on a fundamental level. (I haven’t spoiled all the appearances in here; suffice to say, Gaiman packs the frames with quite the array of Marvel icons, including one whose name in the series, once I finally realized who it was, made me laugh quite a bit.)

But if all Marvel 1602 gave us was a glorified What If? comic, that wouldn’t really make it as engaging as it is. Instead, Gaiman focuses in very specifically on this time and place – a change in the English monarchy, and a lot of fear of the supernatural – but more than that, makes the question of “why this time?” not just speculative, but part of the story itself. And indeed, as it unfolds, and we realize what’s led to this, it allows Gaiman to play with richer ideas about the notion of heroism, the role of heroes in our own lives, and what it means to be…well, that would be a spoiler. (But it’s such a neat idea!) No, Marvel 1602 isn’t the kind of comic book that transcends the typical Marvel audience. This is a superhero story, even if it is one that takes place in the 1600s. But what it is is a wonderful reminder of just how many ways there are to tell a familiar story, and a fantastic exploration of archetypes, tropes, and ideas that have become larger than the characters that gave birth to them. (It is, in many ways, to Marvel as a whole what Into the Spider-Verse was to Spider-Man – a reminder that stories are about so much more than just the one person they seem to be about.) Rating: ****


Amazon: The Dead Student | Murder on the Rockport Limited | Marvel 1602

2019 Vacation Reads Part 2: The Crack in Space / The Left Hand of Darkness / The Cyberiad

After keeping up my blogging for a nice streak (I went more than 40 days without missing a one!), going on a vacation with my family gave me a nice excuse to take a break from my reviews. But, of course, it’s vacation, which meant I read…a lot. So over the next few days, I’ll be doing some shorter reviews to catch back up to date on everything I read over vacation (and a couple since then as well.)


crack-comics-comic-wallpapers_763002It’s somewhat unusual to find Philip K. Dick being as overtly political as he is in The Crack in Space; after all, Dick is mainly known for his more philosophical and cosmological ideas, and less for his direct commentaries on the world around him (even though the influence of the times is fairly evident in his work). And yet, The Crack in Space is about the first African-American candidate for president, and just what it would take for America to overcome racial prejudice in order to consider electing a non-white man to the highest office of the land.

Even if Dick was too conservative in his timeline in how long it would take the country to do that, his ideas here about what it would take are strong ones. There’s overpopulation, a younger generation that feels there’s no place for them in society, and concern about employment, all of which contributes to the economic anxiety of the country. Oh, and there’s also a gateway to a parallel universe that might provide an answer to all of this – if, that is, we could just figure out what keeps happening to our explorers over there.

As with any Dick novel, The Crack in Space has ideas to spare, but unlike his best work, they don’t entirely flow together all that well. Indeed, The Crack in Space feels a bit all over the map, with interesting ideas and characters dropping out of the novel abruptly, an ending that feels vague and too open-ended, and too many themes that don’t quite coalesce. But even so, it’s compelling in the way Dick can often be, as he zeroes in on this parallel world (one that turns out to be a sequel to one of my favorite Dick short stories, “Prominent Author”) or plays around with a pair of twins with a most unusual shared attribute. It’s readable and intriguing, as always, but it’s a novel more for Dick completionists than for casual fans. Rating: ***


thlfthndfd1974It’s taken me a few books to get into the rhythms of Ursula K. Le Guin and to understand how she approaches her stories. In many ways, my issues with The Left Hand of Darkness are the same issues I had with The Dispossessed, my initial exposure to Le Guin as an adult. Both are novels more about their ideas and worlds than any traditional plot; they are stories, yes, but ones told entirely through inference – through the ways that a society can shape an individual, through Le Guin’s ideas about how we think about our own relationship to our communities, through the exploration of character as a product of our civilization, and not the other way around.

All of which goes to explain why I think I admire and respected The Left Hand of Darkness more than I truly “enjoyed” it. I was completely immersed in Le Guin’s world of Winter, where the inhabitants’ gender changes and shifts over their lives, leading to a world similar to our own, but one where the traditional gender roles never truly developed in the way they did on our own. This seemingly simple change ripples throughout the world of Winter, giving Le Guin a way to comment on how gender defines so much of our own lives, all without ever explicitly saying such.

Is there a story to The Left Hand of Darkness? There is, as the representative of a galactic order attempts to convince the world of Winter to join it. But that story often feels secondary to the book, pushed to the background to allow Le Guin to immerse the reader in folklore, power plays, societal rituals, and more. Really, this is a book – much like many episodes of Star Trek – about looking at an alien society and seeing our own through it. And while some aspects of the novel work better than others (I will defer here to Charlie Jane Anders’s rich essay on the novel in The Paris Review that looks at the novel’s exploration of gender through the eyes of a transgender woman, evaluating what it does well and where it falls flat), there’s no denying that Le Guin has made a world that lives and breathes mightily. It is a remarkable achievement, but for all of that, it’s one whose pleasures are more from the world it makes than any story or plotting, or even characters. It is a masterful piece of writing, but one that you may “enjoy” less than you respect. Rating: **** ½


21079821

If, like me, your only real exposure to the works of Polish science-fiction author Stanislaw Lem is SolarisThe Cyberiad will likely throw you for a bit of a loop. Solaris is a moody, philosophical, complex work about human longing and loss, using the trappings of science-fiction to tell a story about love and death. So when it turns out that The Cyberiad is a collection of comedic, goofy stories about robots and inventors – and that they’re not only genuinely funny, but wildly and comically inventive – well, that wasn’t what I expected. But it certainly didn’t keep me from thoroughly enjoying every wonderfully weird page of this collection.

The stories in The Cyberiad revolve around Trurl and Klapaucius, two of the greatest inventors of the universe, and their various competitions, journeys into the universe, rivalries, and more. What this allows Lem to do is make a wide variety of stories, all of which touch on rich ideas about cybernetic intelligence and the nature of self, all within deeply comic, even silly frameworks. In one, Trurl makes the dumbest computer of all time, and then has to run from it when it refuses to believe that 2 and 2 don’t make 3; in another, Trurl and Klapaucius encounter the famed “PHT” pirate, only to discover that he’s actually a PHD pirate who wants knowledge, and demands the inventors make him something that can feed his desire for more information.

Trying to convey the plots of any of these stories is a fool’s errand, to put it mildly; the closest thing I can sometimes compare this to is Voltaire’s Candide, where the sheer inventiveness of the silliness can provide its own joy, even as it sometimes makes the plots wonderfully incomprehensible. And while The Cyberiad isn’t as insightful as Candide (or Solaris), that doesn’t mean that the collection doesn’t have a lot to say. Whether it’s exploring man’s desire to dominate others through technology or the appeal of stories or wondering what the Highest Possible Level of Development of life in the universe can be, Lem has no shortage of ideas and thoughts about the world, and his stories allow him to play around with his ideas in ways that encourage thought while still focusing on just having fun. And if you can’t appreciate a world in which someone creates a machine that can make absolutely anything, as long as it begins with the letter “n,” well, I don’t know what to tell you. But it was a genuinely fun read, and a different side of Lem than what I knew existed. Rating: **** ½


Amazon: The Crack in Space | The Left Hand of Darkness | The Cyberiad

2019 Vacation Reads Part 1: The Heroes / A Darker Shade of Magic / A Slip of the Keyboard

After keeping up my blogging for a nice streak (I went more than 40 days without missing a one!), going on a vacation with my family gave me a nice excuse to take a break from my reviews. But, of course, it’s vacation, which meant I read…a lot. So over the next few days, I’ll be doing some shorter reviews to catch back up to date on everything I read over vacation (and a couple since then as well.)


the-heroes-joe-abercrombie-9780316193566Set in the world of his First Law trilogy, Joe Abercrombie takes on the fantasy war novel in the standalone novel The Heroes, which tells the story of a three-day battle between the forces of the North and the Union, all over an unimportant hill in the middle of nowhere significant. With a scope that includes more than a dozen different perspectives throughout the book – on both sides of the battle – Abercrombie plunges you into the conflict, depicting every aspect of it, from the large-scale planning to the brutality of the front lines, from the feints and bluffs to the incompetent commanders, from the individual acts of heroism to the pathetic acts of cowardice.

As ever, Abercrombie is incredibly character-driven and grounded in realism, refusing to flinch from the unpleasant aspects of his world, but also treating his characters with respect, no matter how flawed or selfish they might be. The Heroes uses all of these elements superbly, making a book that explores war in all of its horrors, while also understanding how it can forge bonds, shape destinies, and more. It’s neither pro-war nor anti-war; instead, it shows the toll it can take on people, and celebrates those who have to fight them, even as it questions whether any of it is worth the human cost involved, or the way that the people who suffer least so often are those who send others to their deaths. In that, it’s pure Abercrombie, looking at so many fantasy tropes and stories and exploring them from the inside out, turning it all over and questioning whether the legend is more important than the truth, all while telling a gripping read with countless great characters, incredible action, and a compelling, unputdownable narrative. Rating: *****


jacketOne of the perils of reading fantasy is the “wait for the next book” problem. Any fan of the genre knows the sort of thing I’m talking about – that feeling when you’ve read a book that feels entirely like it’s setting up the great story to come, but not quite satisfying on its own terms. V.E. Schwab’s A Darker Shade of Magic doesn’t quite evade this trap – there’s a real sense that the bigger story is still to come in this series – but it does give you a self-contained story and a world that you’re more than willing to keep exploring, even if it feels ultimately more abrupt and short than you might hope it would.

But what a world Schwab gives us here, and what rich ideas! Multiple Londons, each of which finds its own relationship with magic, from a full embrace to absolute denial, and only a rare few can span those worlds. And our main protagonist, Kell, is one, but only using a magic that demands the use of his own blood, quite literally, adding a compelling and strange wrinkle to things. Add into the mix royal intrigues, inter-dimensional smuggling, mysterious pasts, the nature of magic, and a proud female thief with dreams of being a pirate queen, and you’ve got a world that absolutely grips you and leaves you wanting more.

For all of that, the story here feels a little perfunctory and brief, with a lot of the book feeling more like the setup for a larger series and the conflict here ultimately a little disappointing. But that’s a relatively small grumble, given how eagerly I found myself devouring Schwab’s book, and how much I ended it eager to see what else happens in this trilogy. Schwab gives you a full story here, which I admire, but it still feels a bit like a teaser for what’s to come…but it’s a heck of a teaser, and one that worked for me and then some. Rating: ****


915rt2fzyolTerry Pratchett’s A Slip of the Keyboard is probably a book more for fans than anyone else, but that makes sense – after all, this is a collection of non-fiction pieces by the author that span multiple decades, and cover things that are largely his own opinions and perspectives. The art of writing, the origins of stories, the questions of genre – all of those are dealt with, but so are more serious issues, including wildlife preservation, but most notable, the right to die, as the final section of the collection moves into Pratchett’s desire to have the right to end his own life as his suffering from Alzheimer’s moved into its final stages.

So, yes, this is more of a collection for those who want to see how Pratchett saw the world than it is for anyone else – but if you’re in that audience, you’ll find this a compelling, fascinating read. More than anything else, what may strike you so often is the sheer anger that pervades the book – something you might not immediately associate with Pratchett. Yes, he’s funny here, and funny throughout, but there is a refusal to suffer fools that permeates so much of this, and especially as the collection segues into his contemplation of his own end, that humor fades in the face of his rage at so many things – the British health system, yes, but also a universe that feels so unjust.

But as Neil Gaiman points out in the introduction to the collection, that rage is part of what gives us Pratchett’s books. And when you think about it, it’s true – look no further than Sam Vimes, whose constant battle with his own fury at injustice is also what leads him to be the man he is. A Slip of the Keyboard may not tell you where his characters and ideas come from (although there are some glimpses of inspiration here and there), but what it will help you to do is understand the man behind Discworld, behind Nation, behind the Bromeliad trilogy, and understand how his anger and his comedy are inextricable from each other. That alone would be enough to recommend the collection, even without the insights, the great writing, the comic asides, the thoughtful philosophical musings, and so much more. Rating: ****


Amazon: The Heroes | A Darker Shade of Magic | A Slip of the Keyboard

Easy Riders, Raging Bulls, by Peter Biskind / **** ½

libro-easy-riders-raging-bulls-how-the-sex-drugs-and-roc-d_nq_np_949383-mlm26089118649_092017-fIf you were to ask me what the best period for American film was, I’d be hard pressed to argue that it wasn’t the 1970s, a period where a slew of factors gave us some of the most personal – and most interesting – films of all time. From big-budget pictures like The Godfather to personal stories like Mean Streets, from the revolutionary Easy Rider to the predecessor of the modern blockbuster Jaws, the 1970s was a time of incredible growth and change for the film industry, and there are no shortage of films from the decade that can be held up among the greatest films of all time.

Peter Biskind’s Easy Riders, Raging Bulls tells the story of that decade, explaining just what led to an era in film so dominated by directors who were given free reign to make their own unique pictures, and what happened by the 1980s that brought that to a close. Beginning with Bonnie and Clyde and ending with Heaven’s Gate (more or less), Biskind’s book covers so much ground, and so many careers, that it would be easy for the book to fall into chaos. After all, Biskind isn’t just telling the story of a slew of directors – Dennis Hopper, Francis Ford Coppola, Martin Scorsese, Hal Ashby, Paul Schrader, Terrence Malick, William Friedkin, Steven Spielberg, and George Lucas, just to hit the main focuses – but of the studio system of the time, key figures in the decade (Jack Nicholson, Robert Evans, Robert Towne, etc.), and even politics and other key social moments. In other words, there’s a lot going on, and even in a dense read like this, it would be easy to lose track of the story.

But Biskind’s organized, careful approach pays off incredibly well here, with each chapter primarily focusing on a single figure, even as the book proceeds year by year through the decade and beyond. Biskind’s clearly done his research (more on that in a moment), and the book is peppered with anecdotes, quotes, data, stories, and details that bring not only the era to life, but each of these figures, many of whom loom larger than life in the minds of many cinephiles. Biskind is obviously deeply influenced and reverential of many of these films, but he’s also not blind to how so many of these figures changed along the way, and how many of the same things that made them great filmmakers also led to the destruction of the New Hollywood they were building.

That means, of course, that many of these portraits are less than flattering, bringing us back to Biskind’s research. It’s worth noting that many of the figures in this book have accused Biskind of distorting their words, and many of them have come out angrily against the book in general. Is that because of their horrible behavior on display, or because Biskind exaggerated for dramatic effect, or some combination of the two? Hard to say. It’s fairly obvious when Biskind interjects his own opinions into the book – his personal takes on certain movies and people arise unexpectedly, and take away from some of the more objective-feeling portions of the story – and the clear arc of the book is clear from the prologue, as he explains that what happened in the 1970s was both an explosion of creativity but also brought about its own end in its excesses and lack of self-control.

For all of the doubts and opinions, there’s little denying that film fans will find Biskind’s book compulsively readable, from its behind the scenes stories of so many iconic films to its unflinching portraits of towering talents. It humanizes them, and it may tear down their image, but it also doesn’t ever take away from an incredible period in cinema where creativity, originality, and personal voices came through in remarkable ways, leading to some of the greatest films of all time. As a portrait of an essential era in cinema, Easy Riders, Raging Bulls is a must-read, looking behind the curtain at all the pieces that had to come together to make it all happen – and the same pieces that would probably attempt to keep it from ever happening again.

Amazon

Spider-Man: Far from Home / *** ½

mv5bmgzlnty1zwutytmznc00zjuylwe0mjqtmtmxn2e3odyxmwvmxkeyxkfqcgdeqxvymdm2ndm2mq4040._v1_sy1000_cr006741000_al_Let’s go on and get some grumbles out of the way first: no, Spider-Man: Far From Home isn’t as good as its predecessor, Homecoming. It’s a little shaggier, more indebted to the larger Marvel Universe than the first film, and it suffers from that, as Spider-Man has always been a hero more suited to personal stories when possible. (To that same end, I have mixed feelings about the current MCU direction of taking Spider-Man from his “regular guy” roots into a wealthy successor to Tony Stark, complete with omnipotent technology and unlimited funding.) The action is, as per usual for the MCU, adequate at best, and while there’s an in-film reason why it feels so flat at times, that doesn’t make it any more involving to watch, turning the film into CGI spectacle. And maybe worst of all, the movie wastes quite a few solid actors, most notable Martin Starr and JB Smoove, both of which are entirely useless – and surprisingly laugh-free – in their roles.

That’s more than a few knocks on the film, I know, and so it may surprise you that I still enjoyed Far From Home more than that paragraph would suggest. That’s not because the film is so good, but because it has so many great sequences and great moments, and nails the quiet moments so well, that I’m willing to forgive a lot of those issues, many of which fall under the umbrella of “well, this is what all Marvel movies do.” (It feels unfair to dump on a movie for doing what it’s supposed to do, more or less, and certain things are just de rigueur for Marvel films.)

So let’s talk instead of what the film does well, which boils down to two big areas. The first comes to the way it embraces the powers of one of my favorite Spider-Man villains, finally giving him the big-screen treatment I’ve been waiting for for a long time. The identity of this villain is technically a secret of the film (although long-time readers will probably long since have guessed his identity from the trailers), so I’ll simply say that even as a kid, I thought this particular villain was one of the more interesting and unique ones out there, and one whose abilities could really lend themselves to some neat sequences in film. And director Jon Watts really runs with those, particularly in a surreal mid-film sequence that does everything I always wanted someone to do with this villain, twisting reality in inventive ways and using the powers not as a physical attack, but as a psychological one. Add to that a charismatic performance by the chosen actor, to say nothing of a great reveal, and that alone gives Far From Home something compelling. (The way the film keeps touching on some interesting metaphorical and thematic ideas about those powers, but doesn’t do much with them, is more disappointing, however.)

The other great area of the film has nothing to do with super powers at all, and everything to do with the high school crush that Peter Parker (Tom Holland) has on MJ (Zendaya). More than anything, where Spider-Man comics worked was in the sense that Peter Parker was your average guy – he wasn’t a god, he wasn’t a millionaire, he wasn’t a government agent. He was just a regular guy trying to make things work in New York City. And in embracing Parker’s young age and his burgeoning relationship with MJ, Far From Home makes me care about Parker in a way no amount of action ever could. Holland’s genial awkwardness is endearing enough, but Zendaya is effortlessly charming as well, bringing the sort of “cool girl who’s as much image and bluff as anything else” that I’ve seen in so many of my own students over the years. And the awkward tension between the two hits home and feels true in a way that makes the film really feel genuine, giving it stakes that I cared about more than any of the big battles.

Those two areas are almost enough to recommend Far From Home, despite it suffering from most of the typical Marvel problems and feeling less low-key than its superior predecessor. (That and a phenomenal mid-credits cameo that I wouldn’t dream of spoiling, but which brought me absolute joy for multiple reasons, all of which you probably know if you’ve seen the film.) Far From Home isn’t perfect, and I worry that the efforts to turn Peter Parker into the next Tony Stark are turning the character away from what I like most about him. But before all of that happens, there’s the great romantic beats, the wonderful teenage awkwardness, and a villain both truly compelling and remarkably compatible with some great cinematic sequences, and those are enough to have me leave the theater smiling.

IMDb

White is for Witching, by Helen Oyeyemi / *** ½

71ejvyrn5ilThere were all kinds of reasons I picked up Helen Oyeyemi’s White is for Witching. An intriguing title; a striking cover; a lot of blurbs emphasizing the Gothic qualities of the book and comparing it to something by Shirley Jackson; a vague sense of Oyeyemi’s growing reputation as a writer; an unrefusable price at the bookstore – all of these and more went into my decision to grab it. All of which means that I went into White is for Witching feeling like this was definitely a book that was up my alley – which means that my disappointment with it might well be a case of expectations more than the book itself.

White is for Witching is undeniably well-written, with passages that you can lose yourself in, and mood to spare. Some of that undeniably comes from Oyeyemi’s choice to have the book narrated not only by two of its main characters using first person and a third-person limited narrator covering its tragic protagonist, but also by their house itself, a living entity that emanates menace and unease at all times. And as Oyeyemi follows the story into more and more surreal and nightmarish territory, her writing helps with that immersion, giving you less and less concrete to cling to and throwing you more and more into a world of conflicting sensory impressions, unclear realities, and unreliable narrators.

All of which is great…so why did White is for Witching leave me more disappointed than thrilled? It’s got some intensely creepy sequences (especially as it hits the climax), and Oyeyemi’s poetic prose stylings are just the right level of “writerly” to keep from sliding into pretentiousness. And there’s plenty of rich subtext, from commentaries on everything from contemporary British race-relations to sexual repression to mental illness, bringing the paranoia and repression of the house (and its Gothic inspirations) neatly into the modern day era.

But for all of those great ideas, White is for Witching ultimately becomes more of an exercise in mood than any sort of coherent plot. I’m all for ambiguity in ghost stories, and the question of whether Miranda is mentally ill or seeing ghosts – or both – is a perfectly valid way to play out this story. But Oyeyemi doesn’t seem to be much concerned as to which it is, or why these ghosts might be here, or in how Miranda’s pica is contributing to any of this – or, for that matter, what the significance of her pica is in the first place. Sometimes you’ll read a deeply symbol-laden piece of writing and get the impression that, while you may not get it all, you’re fairly certain the author does, but I didn’t finish White is for Witching with that feeling at all. Instead, I felt like I had been immersed in a moody, compelling world for a few hundred pages, and got some nice creeps out of it, but that none of it really added up to much other than some nice passages and some ambitious ideas that don’t come to anything. It’s a well-written piece of Gothic fiction, but ultimately, it feels like a lot of sound and fury that signifies nothing.

Amazon

The Murders of Molly Southbourne, by Tade Thompson / **** ½

71gwpkawmklIf all The Murders of Molly Southbourne had was its conceit, it would still be an intense, surreal read. That conceit? Every time Molly Southbourne bleeds – for whatever reason – a new version of her is borne. And every one of these new mollies goes bad soon, trying to kill her and everyone else they see – which means that Molly, from an early age, has to learn to murder all of these versions of herself and dispose of the bodies.

That, you have to concede, is one hell of a premise for a book, and that alone is probably enough to intrigue you. But that doesn’t get into the slow realizations that the world of Tade Thompson’s novella isn’t quite our own. Or into the nightmarish opening of the book. Or to the existential dread of the conclusion. Or the escalation of events as the mollies begin to change, or as Molly goes to college, or what happens once puberty hits and she starts dealing with the repercussions of her periods.

The Murders of Molly Southbourne is around 100 pages, and as such, to give too much of the plot away would be to spoil the fun. But I’ll say this: I started this book late at night, planning on just reading a few pages before going to bed, and instead, I stayed up until well past midnight to devour every wild event as it unfolded.

Now, be aware of what you’re getting into here – The Murders of Molly Southbourne is violent, full of body horror, slightly surreal, and ultimately enigmatic in a lot of ways. Indeed, author Tade Thompson makes the most of his novella form, leaving so many things open to interpretation or even flat-out refusing to give even clues. Instead, we’re thrown into Molly’s world quickly, and simply told that these are the rules, and this is her life, with all of the horror and doubt that comes with it.

Does Thompson deal with the more philosophical and existential questions posed by these dopplegangers? In some ways, yes. But in more ways, The Murders of Molly Southbourne is something more akin to pure horror – not quite a vampire novel, not quite a zombie tale, but drawing off of both of them, and adding in brutal action, body horror, and even a hint of the “trained child assassin” trope. And that bizarre mix ends up making the book unlike much else that I’ve read, giving you a wild ride that’s completely unpredictable down to the final pages.

By the end, I’ll concede that some of the nagging questions about the book feel a bit bewildering, and while I’m incredibly excited to hear that Thompson has a follow-up coming (without getting spoilery, any sequel to this can’t be a pure rehashing, which I admire), I can’t help but feel that this is as much a teaser for something more as it is an entirely self-contained narrative, despite the fact that there’s a very clear ending and conclusion to it all. But what a teaser this is, and for all of the vagueness and ambiguity, nothing can detract from how gripping, intense, and nightmarish the whole ride is.

Amazon

Exhalation, by Ted Chiang / *****

716-zcqkzqlLike a lot of people, I first became aware of the writing of Ted Chiang when I saw the movie Arrival, a gripping, complex piece of science fiction based on his story “Story of Your Life.” That led me to pick up his first short story collection and be blown away by what I found there – a staggering range of ideas and imagination that came together into rich, humane stories both about big ideas and very human moments. That set a high bar for his second collection, Exhalation, and while I think I may slightly prefer the range and scope of that first collection, that doesn’t mean that Exhalation isn’t a phenomenal collection, one that solidifies my feelings on Chiang’s talent. And what Exhalation gains in reducing its range is depth, as the collection finds a single theme and finds so many ways of exploring it all without ever feeling like it’s repeating itself.

That theme is the question of free will, and how it could be compatible with science, physics, time travel, or even religion, and Chiang finds new approach after new approach to handle that question. Take the collection’s opener, “The Merchant and the Alchemist’s Gate,” which centers around a gate that allows people to step back and forth through time by twenty year increments, all while situating itself as a story deeply rooted in Islamic faith and tradition. With tales within tales, “Gate” immerses you in its world, but more than that, makes the story about so much more than that conceit, instead exploring different ways that people handle the knowledge of their own fates, and how that knowledge is both compatible with free will and yet undeniably set in stone. Heady fare, but in Chiang’s hands, it becomes a dazzling set of tales that all combine in unexpected ways that illuminate his ideas while being more about the characters than anything else.

Or what of Exhalation‘s closing novella, “Anxiety is the Dizziness of Freedom,” where a technology that allows people to speak to versions of themselves in alternate universes leads to any number of existential crises. If I do something horrible, but another version of me doesn’t, who is the “real” version of me, and which did something out of character? What if someone in the world of my other self has been hurt – since that world is different because of my choices, does that mean that it’s my fault that they got hurt? Karmically, do things even out, since I may take a good action but another version of me takes a bad one? Chiang revels in the complexities of the question and makes those issues the story itself, watching a society both in thrall to this new technology and struggling to make sense of what it all means in terms of their own lives, both personally and as a society.

I’ve gone this long, and I’ve only touched on two of the stories here, but I could do that for all of them – for the creatures of the title story, who realize that their very existence is linked to the fate of their worlds in ways they don’t understand; for the panicked narrator of the frantic warning that is “What’s Expected of Us,” trying their best to stop us from something that’s inevitable; for the world of “Omphalos,” where undeniable proof of a Creator’s existence is thrown into relief by an astronomical observation whose implications are stunning and truly shattering; for the fascinating digital creatures of “The Lifecycle of Software Objects,” whose story follows them from initial conception far into the future, as programmers begin wondering when questions of sentience and self-control start applying to electronic creations…the list goes on and on.

What you have, essentially, is nine incredible stories, each of which has so much to offer – ideas, beliefs, questions, proposals, knowledge, imagination – and yet somehow always finds its grounding in issues deeply humane and personal. For all of Chiang’s high concepts – and he undeniably has them – what makes his stories special is the way that he uses them to truly think about his science-fiction conceits in terms of what they say about us as a species and a human race – and that aspect is what you’ll find yourself thinking about long after you’ve finished the last page.

Amazon

Three Novellas by Scott Lynch

When I saw that Scott Lynch (of The Lies of Locke Lamora) fame had released a digital novella, I was thrilled for the chance to read more of his work while waiting on the next entry in the Gentleman Bastards series. With his first three books, Lynch made a name for himself, and rightfully so – in his Ocean’s Eleven-style fantasy novels, Lynch mixes banter, con games, heists, and magic effortlessly, making something that’s just a blast to read. So a new novella, even if it wasn’t a Locke Lamora story, was okay by me.

And then I found out that he didn’t have just one out – he had two others that had somehow escaped me. So of course I made a little binge read for myself.

tumblr_pcm9e4mxxd1su2k5go1_500In the Stacks is the earliest (I believe) of the three, but there’s everything you’ve come to love about Lynch here already – fantastic group dynamics and banter, propulsive pacing, and a sense of fun that’s hard to escape. It doesn’t hurt that In the Stacks has such a great premise, though, revolving around the fifth year exam at the High University of Hazur, a school for students of magic. That exam? To return a book to the university’s living library. Oh, and that word “living”? That’s not a metaphor – the library, thanks to storing all of those magical tomes, has come to life. And it’s not all that friendly, or safe.

In the Stacks feels like a fantastic one shot D&D campaign at times, with a great party of characters (a group of student friends and two librarians) and a slew of imaginative creatures, forces, and threats to come, all of which play with the library setting deeply in ways I hate to spoil. (Suffice to say, vocabulary is quite sought after by one of the inhabitants, while elsewhere, you learn what happens when a book falls apart.) The whole thing moves wonderfully, with each new encounter and development adding to the imaginative “dungeon” Lynch has created and really adding to the fun of the adventure. The final reveal feels a bit arbitrary, but it’s not actively bad in any way so much as it feels tacked on. Still, none of that detracts from what fun this is.

9200000098679315Next up comes The Effigy Engine, whose dedication to Glen Cook should tell you what’s obvious as you read – that this is Lynch’s tribute to The Black Company books, with his own band of mercenaries (called the Red Hats) being drafted into a war and discovering that the other side has invented what’s essentially a tank, changing the face of the war. A novel concept, for sure, but as ever, Lynch is more interested in his characters and their relationships, which is to the novel’s credit, because that’s what makes The Effigy Engine truly work.

That’s not to say that the battle sequences aren’t effective (they are), or that exploration of how a mechanized tank would change war in a magical world isn’t intriguing (it is). But really, what I came away from The Effigy Engine thinking about was the characters – the magic-wielding comrade whose beard has become a replica of an armada, our wryly funny narrator Watchdog who explains to us just how magic works here, or the commander who’s quite literally a mother figure to him. The Effigy Engine might be a novella, but that short length doesn’t keep it from building out a great world quickly, and giving the sense that there could easily be plenty of stories to come in this series – and I’d definitely pick them up.

tumblr_petur27bpe1su2k5go2_400But the novella that I originally came to pick up, A Year and a Day in Old Theradane, is by far the standout of the trio – a fact that says as much about Theradane as the other two, given how great each entry really is. But Theradane is such a treat on so many levels that it’s hard not to just spend this whole entry talking about just it. Even if all it was was the premise, that would be enough. Because here’s that premise: a crew of retired criminals gets given a job that they can’t refuse or fail. And that job is to steal something quite valuable…an entire street of the city.

That’s already a fantastic hook for a story, and Lynch has a ton of fun letting the characters try idea after idea about how you end up stealing a whole street, making half of the book’s fun figuring out how he’s going to have them do it. (I really like the solution.) But because that’s not enough for Lynch, he gives us so much more: a set of characters with their own complex pasts, a government whose members take their struggles for power quite literally, a mechanical man who has freed himself in a “One Piece at a Time” approach, and a restaurant/bar/casino/inn built out of the remains of a fallen dragon. And that’s not even all that Theradane pulls in, until you’re so immersed in this world that you forget that Lynch has built it not in a sprawling saga, but in a tight novella. It is an absolute treat, and a must not only for any Lynch fan, but for fans of offbeat, fun fantasy novels that are more adventure than grandiose epic.

Ratings

  • In the Stacks: **** ½
  • The Effigy Engine: ****
  • A Year and a Day in Old Theradane: *****
Amazon: In the Stacks | The Effigy Engine | A Year and a Day in Old Theradane

The Wrong Kind of Blood, by Declan Hughes / ****

y648Declan Hughes’s debut novel, The Wrong Kind of Blood, comes complete with a pair of endorsements by both crime icon Michael Connelly but also John Connolly, who’s one of my favorite writers working today. That’s no small feat for a book I hadn’t heard of, and all but guaranteed I’d pick up the book. Having read it, it’s not hard to see what drew both men to Hughes’s richly-detailed and well-written world, even if there’s more of a sense of promise here than a fully realized crime story.

The setup here is pure noir – after several years (and some personal tragedies that are only gradually explained over the course of the book) in America, private detective Ed Loy has returned home to Dublin in order to bury his mother. But not long after he gets back, he finds himself being drawn into first the case of a missing husband, and from there, into a labyrinthine plot of real estate development, shady businessmen, drugs, and a lot of murders – as well as the possible fate of his own father, who went missing when he was young.

Prime noir fare, of course, and Hughes carries it well, with a keen eye for detail and a great sense of dialogue and place. Indeed, the best aspects of The Wrong Kind of Blood are the more observational sections, from Hughes’s ear for dialogue to his sense of how Dublin has changed since his departure. As with Michael Connelly’s Bosch books, The Wrong Kind of Blood is inextricably linked to a time and place – in this case, the real estate boom in Dublin that finds the city erasing bits of its past – and Hughes does his best writing when following those threads that connect the past to the present.

As for the thriller and mystery aspects of the book, The Wrong Kind of Blood does generally well here, even if at a certain point the connections became so complex that I was only sort of following on a zen level. This is one of those novels where nearly every scene is placed with a purpose, which I admire, but often means that key details are thrown in during the middle of moments I didn’t think mattered as much. Add that to a lot of characters using multiple names (whether as an alias, a new identity, or a nod to the Irish language), and there were more than a few times I had to sit and unpack all of the threads to make sure I knew what was going on. Add that to the way that Loy is so often forced into a reactive mode, rather than a proactive one, and there are times when The Wrong Kind of Blood can feel like less than the sum of its parts.

For all of that, though, there’s a lot to enjoy here, from some beautiful writing (there are some interludes that flash back to key moments from the story that are absolutely haunting in their prose) to some wonderful characters, and the ultimate answers here are fascinating ones – not at all what I expected, but compelling in the way that they connect all of the threads without relying on some absurd serial killer responsible for every single one of the book’s victims. The Wrong Kind of Blood definitely feels like a first novel, and there are some weaknesses with it, but it’s promising enough that I’d be curious to see how the books developed and evolved as Hughes got more practice under his belt.

Amazon