After keeping up my blogging for a nice streak (I went more than 40 days without missing a one!), going on a vacation with my family gave me a nice excuse to take a break from my reviews. But, of course, it’s vacation, which meant I read…a lot. So over the past few days, I’ve be doing some shorter reviews to catch back up to date on everything I read over vacation (and a couple since then as well.)
This will be the last of my short capsule review round-ups; after this I plan on returning to my typical-length reviews, including one of Laura Lippman’s new novel and hopefully a couple of others.
John Katzenbach has long been one of those great thriller writers that not enough people know about, and even though his latest, The Dead Student, isn’t among his best works, it’s still a gripping and fun enough read that I feel safe telling people looking for a beach read that they could do a lot worse. A story that alternates between a long-simmering plot of revenge, a recovering alcoholic trying to uncover the truth of his uncle’s purported suicide, and a young woman recovering from a recent trauma, Katzenbach deliver his usual thrills, all while giving some of his typically engaging and interesting characters.
Admittedly, the plot of The Dead Student is functional, at best (with some detours into silliness toward the end, especially as revolves around a support group’s involvement in things), and that’s a little less typical for Katzenbach, who has given us some fantastic thrillers in recent years (check out his previous nailbiter, Red 1-2-3). The Dead Student works as a nice little piece of noir, with our protagonists crossing line after line as they attempt to pursue the truth, to say nothing of a compelling villain whose methodology and casual demeanor towards it all makes him a great narrator. And if some of the plot details don’t always work as well as you’d hope – the killer’s motivation ends up feeling like we’re missing some key details, the aforementioned support group involvement – somehow, the book manages to keep you reading and enjoying it, even while part of your brain notes the flaws.
No, The Dead Student isn’t among Katzenbach’s best, but it’s still a great, fun little thriller, with twists and turns aplenty and three great main characters, each of whom brings a lot more to the table than the typical generic crime hero or heroine. If you’re looking for a fun beach thriller read, you could do a lot worse, trust me – you’ll have a lot of fun here. But you’d probably have more if you were reading, say, Red 1-2-3 or The Analyst instead. Rating: *** ½
Last year, The Adventure Zone – an RPG podcast hosted by the McElroy brothers and their dad, and my favorite podcast in the world – made the jump from the audio medium into the world of graphic novels, adapting the first arc of the Balance campaign into the bestselling Here There Be Gerblins. Against all odds, Gerblins was a blast, capturing the goofy spirit of the show while also truly adapting an audio-only, collaborative project into something more streamlined and even coherent. And if there were some little bumps along the way in that adaptation, well, Gerblins was the first arc of the show, and had its own issues, so that was to be expected a bit.
Now comes the second volume of the adaptation, Murder on the Rockport Limited, which finds our brave adventurers infiltrating a train under false pretenses and attempting to not only find a missing artifact, but also solve a murder – or should that be murders, plural? – along the way. It was the first arc of the show that was all truly the McElroys, as Griffin (the DM) made his own story and the rest of the crew started to truly get into their characters, resulting in one of the funniest arcs of the show, as well as introducing some iconic characters for the whole series.
The graphic novel adaptation of Rockport is every bit as good, embracing both the podcast’s jump in quality and the larger sense of the Balance Arc, and finding a great balance between both. While Gerblins occasionally felt like great bits were cut out of the adaptation (understandably, given how tangential they often felt), Rockport feels like it’s much more able to retain a lot of the anarchy of the original series, from the ruthless mocking of a wizardly train attendant to the unexpected appearance of a beloved hotel spokesman to the odd dynamic that arises when three grown men bully an adorable young boy. Having just re-listened to Rockport recently, I can say that this adaptation absolutely captures the spirit of the original story, bringing out the humor of the characters and the McElroy sensibility, all while still making it fit more into the larger shape of the Balance campaign saga. (This last component is in some ways the most interesting thing about the book from the perspective of a TAZ fan, as it allows the story to start bringing out the emotional beats that make all the goofs so special, but they’re hard to talk about in a spoiler-free review.)
I can’t tell you how you’ll feel about Rockport if you’re not already a TAZ fan. Is it accessible to non-fans? Will it make sense if you don’t already love this story? Will you appreciate the cavalcade of in-jokes from MBMBaM and TAZ tossed into the background by artist Carey Pietsch? (Okay, definitely not the last one, but trust me, they’re there, and only add to the evidence of how great of a choice Pietsch is for this project.) But as a long-time fan of the series, Rockport is a ton of fun to read, bringing the arc to life, but more importantly, capturing the spirit of it all wonderfully, and conveying the fun and silliness – and the stakes! – of what the McElroys created. Rating: **** ½
Neil Gaiman has made a career out of stories – not just telling them, although of course he’s done that too. No, Gaiman has always been fascinated by the power of stories – how they can shape our day to day lives, how they guide us and determine our character, and so much more. So it’s no surprise that his Marvel mini-series Marvel 1602 (with gorgeous illustrations by Andy Kubert and Richard Isanove) deals with stories as well, all arising from a simple “what if?” idea: what if the Marvel universe started not in the mid-twentieth century, but at the beginning of the 1600s?
A fun idea, and for a lot of the length of Marvel 1602, the comic is a treat just to see how Gaiman and company have brought these characters to life in recognizable ways while still making them utterly defined by the time period. We recognize the X-Men, even if they are labeled as creatures of witchcraft and hunted by the Inquisition. We know Nick Fury, even if he’s working as a spymaster of sorts for Queen Elizabeth and the idea of “S.H.I.E.L.D.” doesn’t even exist. The blind bard who’s more than capable of handling himself without vision? We know him, too, even if the comic never explicitly calls him Daredevil. Again and again, Gaiman illustrates our knowledge and familiarity with these characters by seeing how much he can change them and yet leave them the same on a fundamental level. (I haven’t spoiled all the appearances in here; suffice to say, Gaiman packs the frames with quite the array of Marvel icons, including one whose name in the series, once I finally realized who it was, made me laugh quite a bit.)
But if all Marvel 1602 gave us was a glorified What If? comic, that wouldn’t really make it as engaging as it is. Instead, Gaiman focuses in very specifically on this time and place – a change in the English monarchy, and a lot of fear of the supernatural – but more than that, makes the question of “why this time?” not just speculative, but part of the story itself. And indeed, as it unfolds, and we realize what’s led to this, it allows Gaiman to play with richer ideas about the notion of heroism, the role of heroes in our own lives, and what it means to be…well, that would be a spoiler. (But it’s such a neat idea!) No, Marvel 1602 isn’t the kind of comic book that transcends the typical Marvel audience. This is a superhero story, even if it is one that takes place in the 1600s. But what it is is a wonderful reminder of just how many ways there are to tell a familiar story, and a fantastic exploration of archetypes, tropes, and ideas that have become larger than the characters that gave birth to them. (It is, in many ways, to Marvel as a whole what Into the Spider-Verse was to Spider-Man – a reminder that stories are about so much more than just the one person they seem to be about.) Rating: ****