October 2023 Reading – Part 2

This is the second part of a lengthy reading post for October – I had to break it up because of the length of the original posting. (What can I say? I did a lot of horror reading for the month.) You can find the first half here.


I don’t really blame John Darnielle for the fact that Universal Harvester was marketed as a horror novel; in the end, if you’re a publisher, you hate to label things as unclassifiable, and there are undeniably elements of Harvester that work as horror. When an Iowan video clerk starts finding tapes returned with unusual scenes spliced into the videos, you can’t help but think of The Ring (even though the tapes remind me of far starker fare), and there’s a definite air of unease and uncertainty around these strange images and where they’re coming from. But Darnielle, as you might imagine from his other books, isn’t that interested in a conventional story here, and if you’re waiting for clear answers about any of it, you’re going to leave disappointed. Universal Harvester is more of a mood piece, one that evokes loss throughout – it is undeniably a book about mothers, but it’s also a book about losing people and what happens to us afterward – and that theme blends with the unease to make something fairly unique. It’s also, if I’m being honest, frustrating; Darnielle has a habit here of building up to plot revelations and then cutting away from them, keeping the book from revealing anything, and by the end, so much of what happened is up to interpretation that I ended the book a little frustrated and disappointed. I think, though, that the book is exactly the book Darnielle set out to make, and I think it’s oddly haunting and beautiful, thanks in no small part to Darnielle’s beautiful prose, where his songwriter abilities serve him well in the crafting of perfect phrases to capture a moment. There’s also a genuine sense of small town life here, anchored by one who knows it and has not just understanding but empathy for these places, and it gives the book a heart it might not otherwise have. It’s a frustrating book and not entirely satisfying, and it’s definitely not a horror novel. But it’s beautifully told and evocative, and that kept me going even when the plot did not. Rating: *** ½


The Amulet was the first book published by Michael McDowell, and there’s always the risk, when you find someone’s earliest work, that it will lack the polish and character that made you fall in love with the author in the first place. I needn’t have worried; while I don’t think The Amulet is as scary as The Elementals or as wild and imaginative as Blackwater, what it has is a pitch-black comic tone and a willingness to go over the top that makes it an absolute delight to read, even if it’s a little loose in terms of plotting. The story here is simple: a cursed amulet is given to a family as an act of revenge, and then keeps making its way across town, causing havoc wherever it goes. What this results in, mainly, is horrific acts of violence followed by catastrophic coincidences out of Final Destination – and gore and destruction are the results. That makes The Amulet essentially a death-delivery device, but McDowell knows that, setting up all of the elements and then waiting to pull the trigger, letting us see the pieces come into play but unable to do anything about it. But then, just to make it all better, it’s all filtered through the lens of a small Southern town, as McDowell fills in the details of every death with the gossip train version of events (which are often laugh-out-loud funny), the quietly resigned and confused reactions of the police and the undertakers, and the efforts of a couple of women to try to make sense of it all. The Amulet is unabashedly a B-movie gorefest, but it knows exactly what it is and delivers the goods, doing so with a sense of humor and fun that’s impossible to ignore. Is it up there with the best things that McDowell has done? Absolutely not. But did I have a ton of fun with it? Oh, hell yes. Rating: **** ½


There’s no way that anything could possibly live up to people’s hopes when you’re talking about Bill Watterson’s first published work since the end of Calvin and Hobbes 28 years ago, but even by those standards, The Mysteries is a bit of a curveball – and yet, it’s one where the expectations are overshadowing how interesting of a book it is. A collaboration between Watterson and caricaturist John Kascht, The Mysteries is an allegorical fable for adults; for all of its picture book trappings, this is undeniably a strange work at times, with unusual composition (my daughter was quite unsettled by the unnatural faces being up close to the frame in one image) and a haunting, odd style that leaves far behind the rich, colorful imagination of Calvin. Instead, you get a stark, gothic black and white, one filled with a sense of the grotesque – but just as Calvin would sometimes set you up in one kind of frame or style only to shift into another, The Mysteries changes into a whole different book as it progresses, changing from a story about a kingdom haunted by mysterious entities into…well, it feels weird to say that I don’t want to spoil something you can read in a few minutes, but I still don’t want to. Suffice to say that The Mysteries feels spiritually like a follow-up to Calvin – a story about the importance of seeing the wonder in the world, a cynical tale about what humans are doing to society and our planet, and a story that still finds beauty in its own way. It’s an odd little tale, with haunting and unsettling art and a take that’s undeniably downbeat…and yet, I think all of that makes it all the more interesting and compelling. Expectations are a difficult thing, but The Mysteries deserves to be judged on its own merits, not on what people wanted – and on its own merits, it’s quite wonderful. Rating: *****


Ken Greenhall’s Elizabeth (subtitle: A Novel of the Unnatural) isn’t a book for all tastes – and it’s not just because it’s not a conventional horror novel in any real sense of the word (although it’s quite unsettling and strange). No, it’s the subject matter here that’s going to be tough on some people – after all, this is a book written by an unabashedly sexual young girl (14!) who may or may not be the vessel for a witch. This is an unreliable and pitch-black narrator – a girl unconcerned with the death of her parents, who enjoys manipulating her uncle using his sexual attraction to her, who is willing to use the powers she has inherited for her own gain, and who has nothing but scorn for the adults around her and their pathetic needs and wants. Indeed, she can come across as borderline sociopathic – which, to be sure, is part of what Greenhall uses so well to make the book all the more discomfiting and unsettling. Elizabeth, as I mentioned, isn’t a “traditional” horror novel; that subtitle calling it “a book of the unnatural” feels right, both in terms of the eerie and slightly unreal mood of the book (and the magics that Elizabeth is, in theory, conjuring up) and in terms of Elizabeth herself, who never quite feels…normal – not in her interactions with people, not in her nonchalant attitude towards an affair with a relative, not in terms of her age, not in terms of just a person, period. (She might find some things in common with Black Ambrosia‘s Angelica, honestly.) The result is hard to shake and gets under your skin in a way that’s not normal, but undeniably succeeds at its goals. The subject matter itself can make it a hard recommendation for some, but those open to its ideas will find a strange, haunting little tale. Rating: ****


Kathe Koja’s The Cipher is one of my great underrated horror novels of all time – an intense, unclassifiable nightmare that I still think of to this day. And so I went into Strange Angels blind, hoping for a similar experience – and I shouldn’t have, because Strange Angels is a whole other kind of book, one that’s more personal drama and far less of a horror novel, even though it’s still told in Koja’s unusual, poetic style and still filled with big, intense emotions and a similar questioning of reality. But whereas The Cipher found that in inexplicable and nightmarish phenomenon, Strange Angels finds it through mental illness – specifically, schizophrenia, which is what afflicts the young artist who finds himself taken under the wing of a photographer for admittedly somewhat selfish reasons. Strange Angels becomes an account of what it’s like to care for someone with deep mental illness, and how those issues can almost “spread” and affect those nearby; it’s also, though, a story about the realities of such illness – about how they can truly destroy someone, about how they’re not just romanticized ways into artistic expression but deeply damaging and difficult, about the toll they take on both the person themselves and those who do their best to care for them. The result can be a bit grueling, both emotionally and psychically, as our narrator finds himself drawn into this unreliable world and doing his best to be both a friend and a caretaker. My unmet expectations didn’t help with Strange Angels, admittedly, but I also never quite fell in love with the book, which I respected more than enjoyed. I think Koja does a great job of plunging you into this world, and in creating a narrator who’s both selfish and empathetic simultaneously, and in giving you this reality of what it’s like to live in this situation – but I just kept waiting for there to be something more to the book than just the day to day experiences, and never quite got there. And when combined with the prose’s tendency to elide time and blur it all into one long experience, I just was kind of glad to be done with it. Do I think it’s a “good” book? Yes – but did I enjoy it, or would I recommend it? Not really. Rating: ***


Philip Fracassi’s A Child Alone with Strangers is the story of a young boy who, after a tragic accident, awakens from a coma to find that he has the ability to sense the thoughts of other people, both in the abstract and in the very specific. And it’s the story of that child being kidnapped by an opportunistic group of criminals hoping to cash in on the insurance payout the family received. And it’s the story of the…thing…that’s living in the old house where they’re hiding out. And by the time you factor in some of the backstories of other characters you get along the way (including an eccentric law enforcement officer, an incestuous couple, not one but two sociopaths), you can’t help but feel like A Child Alone with Strangers is full of interesting ideas, but they all keep elbowing each other out of the way to take center stage, keeping any of them from entirely developing as much as I wanted them to. That being said, A Child Alone with Strangers absolutely entertains and moves along at a good clip, delivering a yarn that is willing to take its time to set all of its pieces into place carefully before unleashing chaos and violence. Fracassi has undeniably read a lot of King (there are many echoes of both King’s style and his structure here), and he’s learned how to deliver an entertaining, vicious, nasty little story that delivers the goods if you’re looking for them. But it also ultimately feels like about three or four books mashed into one, and I wish that it was leaner and more focused, allowing some of the elements to breathe more than they did. As it is, you’ll have a fun enough time, and it does lots of things decently, but no one thing fantastically. Rating: ****


A Different Darkness and Other Abominations is a compilation of stories by Italian horror author Luigi Musolino; they’re stories from across a few of Musolino’s Italian books, compiled into one English language volume, and so I guess there’s a chance that this is the “all killer, no filler” selection – the “best of” anthology – and that I’m getting a slightly biased sense of Musolino’s work. But even if that’s the case, it doesn’t make me any less floored, unsettled, thrilled, disquieted, and just plain caught up in Musolino’s blend of “weird” fiction and cosmic horror, which orbit so often around a simple Italian town and end up in…other…places. Children screaming about stomachs full of eyeballs; dogs returning from the dead for revenge against the ones who killed them; shortcuts into towns that shouldn’t exist; a town only whispered of among truck drivers and feared by all – Musolino has, to steal from another horror icon, “such sights to show you,” and they are universally nightmarish ones. When “Lactic Acid,” the story of a jogger whose brief diversion from his usual path finds him very far afield and in a dark and unfriendly world, is your least unsettling story, you know you’re in for a hell of a ride, and A Different Darkness never really lets up, from the absolute wild ending of “Les Abominations des Altitudes” to the twisted revisiting of a classic Twilight Zone story in “Black Hills of Torment” to the blend of loss and horror that is the title story, Musolino gives everything a bit of an Italian folk horror feel while also plunging you into cosmic nightmares and worlds that simply feel wrong. If it’s not obvious, I loved every moment of this one; it’s unflinching nightmare fuel that feels like a blend of lots of familiar elements – eldritch horrors, Clive Barker’s early work, classic ghost stories and fairy tales – but ends up becoming something wholly unique that feels like nothing else out there, but absolutely delivers the horror goods. If you’re a horror fan, this is essential reading, full stop. Rating: *****


I quite enjoyed Stephen Graham Jones’s My Heart is a Chainsaw, the story of a slasher-obsessed high schooler who becomes convinced that the new rich girl in town is the Final Girl of an upcoming real-life attack, but even so, it’s taken me longer than I planned to get to Don’t Fear the Reaper, Jones’s followup, which returns to Indian Lake four years later alongside Jade, who is not the same person (indeed, she’s even going by Jennifer to show that change), and yet finds herself in the midst of pure horror as an escaped serial killer starts making his way through town during a blizzard for the ages. Don’t Fear the Reaper moves much faster than Chainsaw; the first kills are almost instantaneous, as you’d expect for any slasher film, but the mayhem starts much quicker here, and the body count feels higher and the kills more horrifying. That all fits with the “sequel” bits, but as with Chainsaw, the slasher film motif is really just a way of masquerading a pretty compelling piece of character work, as we see Jade dealing with the trauma of discovering the disconnect between the fun of a slasher movie and the reality of living through one, as well as the current state of all of the survivors, who all bear their scars, both internal and external. That idea is borne out from the way that Jones expands the point of view here beyond Jade, giving us narration by a number of characters, including one that seems at first to be revisiting the role of Jade’s essays from the first book before gradually revealing itself as something more. The book sometimes leans a little too hard into the meta nature of slasher films (which, to be fair, Jones lampshades by having Jade ruefully wonder if she was ever this annoying), and Jones has an odd tendency to make dialogue and plotting elliptical, leaving out realizations and details to the point where clarity is sometimes impeded. But those are minor marks against the book, which largely succeeds as one hell of a slasher story – better than the first on that front, I’d say – while also exploring the damage done by previous events and letting us see an underlying story of trauma and growth. A great followup, and it’s upped my enthusiasm for the promise of a third book soon to come. Rating: **** ½


I’ve not read anything Fritz Leiber wrote beyond the Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser books, so I wasn’t quite sure what I would be getting in Smoke Ghost and Other Apparitions, a collection of Leiber’s supernatural and horror(-tinged) short fiction. But from the first story – the titular “Smoke Ghost” – I knew I was in good hands. That story is a tale of the modern world’s unease and malevolence, one that’s infused with a dread specific to the leadup to World War II but feels equally at home today, to where the ghost feels like an inevitable product of the changes in the world around us. There’s a wide variety of tales here, from a truly wild story about puppets with a wholly unexpected reveal to a shaggy dog story with a punchline that made me laugh out loud. Portraits of madness that find emerge from automatic writing babble, surreal tales of hell and temptation, glimpses of a post-apocalyptic world, sweet vignettes of Edgar Allan Poe and lost friends – there’s a wide range here, and it’s all done with Leiber’s trademark mix of imagination, awe, unease, and humor. There are a few weak entries here, including a story of twins that’s too focused on Jungian archetypes to ever come to life, but they’re the minority; mostly, what you’re getting is a varied sprawl of pulpy stories ranging from the deeply unsettling (“Smoke Ghost,” “The Hill and the Hole”) to the funny (“The House of Mrs. Delgato”) to the surprisingly heartfelt (I’m thinking especially here of “The Button Molder,” which feels more autobiographical than you might expect, but also “Replacement for Wilmer: A Ghost Story” which delivers the goods in a wholly unexpected way). Thoroughly enjoyable work from Leiber, who has become an author who almost always brings me joy (with a few exceptions). Rating: ****


Amazon: Universal Harvester | The Amulet | The Mysteries | Elizabeth | Strange Angels | A Child Alone with Strangers | A Different Darkness | Don’t Fear the Reaper | Smoke Ghost and Other Apparitions

2023 Movie Diary: Part 3

Setting aside my own personal feelings on it, I’m always compelled by stories that truly grapple with faith; not in the glib, shallow way of something like God’s Not Dead, but stories like The Last Temptation of Christ, ones that dig into questions about doubt in the face of suffering, about the ways that human beings have to think about the existence of God in a bleak world. Add that to my love of Martin Scorsese as a filmmaker in general, and Silence feels like it was all but made for my interests. The story of two Jesuit priests (Adam Garfield and Andrew Garfield) in 1600s Japan, Silence follows them as they travel to Japan to find the truth behind the fate of their mentor (Liam Neeson), as well as attempting to spread the faith in the face of brutal and violent Japanese oppression. Silence isn’t always an easy watch; while the torture on display is never graphic, its very banality and matter-of-fact presentation only makes it all the more harrowing, as does Scorsese’s emphasis on the moral and spiritual cost of this torture over the physical side. Indeed, the significance of Silence‘s title becomes evident quickly; this is a film about the silence of God in a world full of suffering and torment, and how one can reconcile the deaths of innocent people with the idea of a God who loves humanity. That becomes even more of a difficult question in the film’s closing hours, which finds the film interrogating the colonizing aspects of religion, the egocentricism of the Church, and the hubris that comes with linking your own suffering to that of Christ. These are complex, difficult issues, and it’s to Scorsese’s credit that the film offers no easy answers, only complex situations and questions, down to a final image that complicates matters all over again. I think Silence is perhaps slightly too long, especially in its early going (it’s somewhat frustrating that you could almost cut Adam Driver from the film and not lose much at all), but that time also allows us to contrast the “idealized” dream of the priests with the harrowing realities of Japan; moreover, it makes for a powerful shift into the final act, in which some of these questions become part of the film’s blatant text. Silence is a harrowing, painful watch, not because of the violence but because of the genuine grappling with questions about faith, purpose, and our meaning in the world; what will linger afterward, though, is not a triumph of belief but the depiction of how we deal with hope and belief in the face of the world’s horrors. Rating: **** ½


Well, you can’t say that Larry Cohen isn’t consistent. Much as he did with God Told Me So, in making The Stuff, Larry Cohen takes an intriguing premise with a lot of potential bite and squanders it in a bit of a messy spectacle that never quite works. The titular Stuff here is a new product that everyone wants – it replaces all the food, fills everyone’s needs, and turns everyone into pod people (indeed, the shadow of Invasion of the Body Snatchers is pretty evident throughout). And within moments of the film’s opening, it’s evident that Cohen wants to use this as a satire of consumerist society, tossing in absurd ads, overly enthusiastic testimonials from “normal” people, an investigation anchored in a desire to regain market share, and more. That’s all a good hook, but much as with God Told Me So, the film doesn’t really ever find a way to pull that premise together, waffling too badly between tones (especially horror and comedy) so strongly that never really works as well as it needs to. There are broad comic bits that derail the movie (most notably Paul Sorvino’s bizarre right-wing militia leader), and every time you can see the movie finding its groove, you’ll see it lose it again moments later. It’s held together by Michael Moriarty’s oddball, off-the-wall, low-key performance in the lead, bringing a fun energy that the rest of the film doesn’t really know what to do with or how to match. This all sounds like I hated The Stuff, but I didn’t really; I laughed at multiple sequences and lines, and it’s weird enough to be memorable. Does it work? No, not really…but you can see why it would be a cult favorite. Rating: ***


Mario Bava’s A Bay of Blood (which was released in America under the – let’s be honest, infinitely superior – title of Twitch of the Death Nerve) is widely regarded as one of the foundational texts in the slasher genre, and I can understand that; after all, what we have here is an isolated little house right near a beautiful lake, with people getting picked off one by one, including a group of teenagers who snuck into the place in order to party and have sex. (Apparently, there are at least two kills here that are all but mirrored in the first two Friday the 13th films, but I can’t remember those offhand.) But more than anything, Bay will remind you first and foremost of a Mario Bava film, with its gorgeous style, its inventive camera angles and movement, its clever pacing, and its dark sense of humor. (That latter quality is most evident in the gloriously bonkers ending, which caught me so off-guard that I had to pause the film because I was laughing so hard.) At its core, this isn’t that different from, say, Five Dolls for an August Moon; it’s nominally a mystery film where everyone has a reason to want to claim the land and is willing to do anything to do it, and its anchored less by its plot or memorable characters and more by fantastic sequences (and, yes, brutal and astonishing kills). Bay feels like the ne plus ultra of Bava films; it feels pure and tight in the best ways, and feels like the best example of what the man could do. It’s not my favorite of his films – that’s probably Blood and Black Lace – but it’s really fantastic, and might be the essential one to see if you only had one chance to see what Bava was all about. Rating: **** ½


For much of the first half of Yorgos Lanthimos’s The Lobster, I thought I was discovering a new favorite film. A truly off-the-wall surreal black comedy, The Lobster is a world in which people are not allowed to be single, and are sent to a hotel where they have 45 days to fall in love before being turned into an animal. That surreal premise is underlined by the deadpan performances across the board and the absolutely pitch-black humor, which often had me cackling out loud at the absurdity and silliness of it all. But two things happened as the film progressed that ended up dropping my love of the film. The first is that the second half of the film – which, without getting too heavily into spoiler territory, expands the scope of the film and the range it wants to cover – ends up feeling looser than the rest both tonally and plot-wise, losing a lot of the impact of the first half as well as its wry, offbeat sense of humor. Moreover, though, as the film broadens its ambition, it loses some of the coherency that I was hoping would come as the story progressed – a sense of a thematic link between some of the weirdness, a message of some sort, a coherency that clicked it all into place. Instead, The Lobster ends up feeling a bit shaggy – a collection of ideas more than a coherent story – and while it’s beautifully filmed and expertly performed (Colin Farrell continues his streak of being a great actor in this stage of his career, and there are a slew of winning supporting performances here), it all doesn’t hold together as much as that first hour promises. I still had a lot of fun watching it; it just isn’t quite the instant classic that its first hour promises, and if you’re waiting for it all to cohere into a meaningful allegory, well, I wouldn’t get my hopes up too much. Rating: ****


I’ll fully admit that I didn’t expect to love The Menu as much as I did. An “eat the rich” social satire set in an exclusive restaurant that caters to snobbish foodies…we know where this is going, right? To The Menu‘s credit, you don’t – it avoids the obvious literal interpretation of its ethos and instead delivers a gleefully nasty little black comedy with horror overtones, one that becomes about the disconnect between service workers and the served, all delivered with scorn to spare. The Menu is never really scary, despite the fact that it’s clearly within the horror genre; in fact, it’s often laugh-out-loud funny; Ralph Fiennes’s self-serious chef and especially Nicholas Hoult’s obsessive foodie steal the show, but there’s not really a bad member of the ensemble here, from a pretentious food critic to a washed up action star. Anya Taylor-Joy is our audience surrogate here – a young woman who’s very evidently not supposed to be there – but really, we don’t need one; the film itself is an audience, with the meal a performance writ large that demonstrates its ideas. The Menu is smarter than I expected; it avoids the obvious outcomes and ideas, and instead goes in some wild directions that never mask or blunt its bitter, vicious satirical bite. I had a complete blast with The Menu; what I expected was a story I’ve seen over and over again, but what I got was something more clever, more funny, more stylish, and just more dark fun than I was prepared for. Rating: **** ½


Hideo Nakata’s Ring is my third exposure to the story of the cursed videotape that kills people within a week of watching it; by the time I watched it, I had of course seen Gore Verbinski’s (very good) American remake and read Koji Suzuki’s original novel (which I don’t remember a ton about, although I remember how very, very weird the final book in the trilogy became). So there’s no way of knowing how Ring would play if I had no knowledge of the concept, just as there’s no way of knowing how the film would play without being compared to the Verbinksi film. And sadly, the reality is, while I can certainly see the influence Ring had (it’s more obvious now how much the American remake is a remake and not a fresh adaptation of the novel), it doesn’t hold up as well as its American counterpart. Director Hideo Nakata gives us a couple of solid sequences here to bookend the film (the opening burst of urban legend fare and that closing final reveal), but beyond those, Ring doesn’t often have any of the feel of a horror film. Instead, it’s relatively low key and lacks tension, a fact not helped by the way that Nakata’s protagonists are drug through the story more via psychic messages and visions than they are their own active investigations. You can’t argue that Ring doesn’t cast a long shadow – if nothing else, is this the ur-text for the long haired pale Asian dead girl? – but I also can’t help but know how Verbinski took this same story and amped up the tension and unease, as well as tweaking the story just enough to really strengthen in. I know that almost every American remake of J-horror is a waste of time and pales in comparison to the original, but in the end, that’s just not quite the case here, since the original is a bit of a letdown with a great hook. Rating: *** ½


I studied horror fiction and film in college, and one of things we discussed during those classes was the links between the werewolf archetype and the modern serial killer story. I thought of that a lot during the opening stretch of The Howling, which draws a direct connection between a serial killer being tracked by a local news anchor and a werewolf, even before that connection becomes more explicitly clear. That opening act is the strongest part of The Howling; as the anchor (Dee Wallace) takes part in an intense sting operation that builds to a nightmarish climax, I was really feeling like I was watching an absolute knockout of a film. But as the film shifts focus to an isolated retreat where Wallace goes to recover from her trauma, the film loses that tension quickly, populating its time with a cast of colorful characters (I mean, why else do you cast Slim Pickens in a movie?) as the werewolf metaphor becomes less about serial killers and more about embracing the bestial, animal side of your nature.The Howling has some absolutely incredible transformation sequences that are every bit as good as I’d heard, and director Joe Dante knows how to deliver a few solid setpieces. But The Howling just never quite lives up to that first act, and the revelations of the last act feel like foregone conclusions long before we get there. It’s not a bad little monster film, but it’s a letdown from Dante, whose later films would so nicely embrace comedy and horror perfectly. Rating: *** ½


The easiest comparison I can make with Na Hong-Jin’s The Wailing is to Bong Joon-Ho’s essential Memories of Murder; both are films about a series of killings in small Korean communities; both straddle the lines between drama and thriller and comedy pretty effortlessly and smoothly, segueing between tones without concern about what is “expected.” Both are about inept and comic police officers investigating a horrific set of crimes – in this case, the inhabitants of a small community have abruptly exploded into brutal acts of violence, murdering their families in grisly fashion without reason or purpose. But those killings are also where The Wailing begins to become its own film, because The Wailing really is a horror film at its core, one that has questions about the nature of evil in human beings, about whether evil can be a physical presence, and what happens when we are corrupted by it. (If we’re making Korean film comparisons, I’d also bring up Park Hoon-Jung’s I Saw the Devil here in terms of its relentless plunge into evil and revenge.) With the inciting incident for all of this being possibly linked to the recent arrival of a Japanese man into the community, it would be easy for The Wailing to get into xenophobia and the like, but if that’s there, it remains subtextual; instead, this mainly stays as a thriller cum horror film, one that keeps going to darker and darker places as the evil becomes more and more palpable and perhaps demonic. I’m not sure that the whole film stays together as much as I’d like; the more I think about it afterward, the looser it all feels, and the abrupt and bleak ending feels a little more arbitrary. But none of that detracts at all from some of the incredible setpieces along the way, especially a late night confrontation between our protagonist and a figure whose motivations he is incapable of knowing – and whose stakes couldn’t be higher. The Wailing is long, but it uses its length well, slowly immersing you into its world before systematically undermining that reality and revealing something darker and more unsettling underneath. I’m not sure it all holds together, but it’s still a compelling, disturbing experience for every minute of its runtime. Rating: ****


Like so many others, I reacted to the original trailers for Pig with delight – Nicolas Cage in a John Wick-esque thriller about a man retrieving his truffle pig? Sign me up! But as the film released, I heard again and again that that wasn’t the movie you were getting – that Pig was instead quiet, thoughtful, melancholy, and much less “mainstream” than you would have assumed, anchored by an astonishing performance by Nicolas Cage. And all of that is true and then some, with the added note that Pig pretty much destroyed me emotionally with its depiction of grief, depression, isolation, and pain. I don’t want to dive too deeply beyond that central conceit of the film – that Cage, playing an isolated loner out in the forest, returns to civilization after the theft of his truffle-hunting pig – because part of the treat of Pig is watching it find new and unexpected directions to go. Director Michael Sarnoski (making one hell of a debut) fills the film with an unease and uncertainty, but also a patience that matches Cage’s beaten, broken performance. He’s a man sleepwalking through life, but Cage’s performance shouldn’t be read as somnambulistic; instead, he’s quiet and withdrawn, hiding from the world, which makes his slow emergences all the more effective (especially given how willing Sarnoski and Cage are to let his moments be entirely conveyed through silent and physical performance). It doesn’t hurt that Cage is paired off with Alex Wolff, unrecognizable at first as the foodie equivalent of a tech-bro, another performance that’s nuanced and layered beyond our first expectations, and one that provides an excellent contrast and scene partner for Cage. But at its core, Pig is a film willing to embrace silence, to refuse to spell out its emotional beats and to rely on its cast to provide them through their performance. I was pretty devastated throughout the final act of the film, which finds an unexpected beauty and grace through its pain, but one that feels in keeping with this whole drama about a man who has lost everything and is barely holding on. In short: I had heard Pig was really good, but even then, I wasn’t prepared for how much it moved me emotionally and how much Cage’s quiet, nuanced performance absolutely riveted me throughout. Cast aside your thriller expectations in favor of a strange, off-kilter drama, but even then, Pig isn’t what you expect – and I think that’s in its best sense. Rating: *****


A little bit Dead Presidents, a lot Treasure of the Sierra Madre, but wholly a Spike Lee joint, Da 5 Bloods finds Lee keeping his newfound rise to acclaim and successful projects continuing, delivering a drama about Black Vietnam veterans returning to the settings of the war in an effort to retrieve stolen gold, only to find greed and its consequences waiting for them. (I told you there was some Sierra Madre here.) But as you’d expect with Lee, that plot is only part of the story, as Lee and his collaborators infuse the film with politics, cultural commentary, rich subtext, naturalistic performances, and a slew of cinematic tricks that quite simply leave the film popping off the screen. Opening with a montage of Vietnam era footage, Bloods jumps us to modern day Vietnam before sending us back and forth to the era of the war, using varied filmstock and aspect ratios to keep us anchored in time, all while still blurring those lines by not recasting his (spectacular) cast to play their younger selves. That naturally brings us to Delroy Lindo, who is delivering a performance for the ages here as a PTSD-riddled MAGA conservative whose life is shaped by his own guilt, experiences, and frustration at the way his life has gone. By the time Lindo is delivering a jaw-dropping monologue direct to the camera with an unmistakable intensity, it’s clear that Lindo has given us one of the great performances of the modern era, turning what could have been a series of tics into a complex and heartbreaking individual. How well that meshes into the larger texture of Bloods is open for debate; this is, like most Lee films, overstuffed with ideas and material, and the shift to a more traditional thriller for the final act can’t help but feel a little disappointing compared to the greatness of the first hour of the film (to say nothing of the way that some of the character motivation gets thornier and harder to justify). And yet, through all of it, it’s so evident that we’re in the hands of a master filmmaker who knows how to shift between drama and thriller, who knows how to stage a tense setpiece and who knows how to let his characters breathe. And when you add to that Lee’s ability to make his films so of a moment in time and to grapple with themes in fascinating ways, you have a fantastic reminder of what film can do in the hands of a great filmmaker: turn a simple story about lost gold into a meditation on race, grief, Vietnam, greed, brotherhood, and colonialism, all while still delivering the goods as a solid thriller. Rating: **** ½


Science fiction as a setup to explore human nature and ideas about consciousness are incredibly up my alley; add into that using aritifical life to discuss grief, loss, memory, and what makes a life, and it’s really no surprise why After Yang has been on my watch list for so long, given that it’s a film about a family whose adoptive android son is dying, and what happens in their efforts to save him. Director Kogonada gives us an undeniably beautiful and moody film here; every shot feels perfectly crafted and gorgeously framed, and the melancholy tone infuses the world while never making the film oppressively dull. And yet, at the same time, After Yang never quite reached my heart as much as I wish it did; at a certain point, it all felt so beautifully constructed as to keep me out, holding me at arm’s length while it explored its notions. There are so many cool ideas here – ideas about what an artificial life would find fascinating, about what part of our nature truly comes from our experiences, about the disconnect between our families real and our families found – and it’s all anchored by Farrell’s usual solid, anchoring performance. But ultimately, it feels much like the museum piece that becomes a subject of the film – fascinating, intelligent, intriguing, but less involving and moving than you would hope. Rating: ****


IMDb: Silence | The Stuff | A Bay of Blood | The Lobster | The Menu | Ring | The Howling | The Wailing | Pig | Da 5 Bloods | After Yang

A Triple Shot of Mario Bava

Despite my growing affection for 60s and 70s Italian horror in the past few years, Mario Bava has always been a bit of a blindspot of mine. Apart from a pretty solid double feature a few years ago, I’ve seen almost none of his work – so with some time around the house, it was time to remedy that.

By all accounts, Lisa and the Devil is one of Bava’s stranger films, and that’s wholly true – but also might undersell how hypnotic and strange the whole movie is, giving you the feel of a waking nightmare that you just can’t get away from. In the broadest sense, the movie is about a woman who ends up, along with the couple that picks her up from the side of the road, at an isolated estate inhabited by a trio of figures: an elderly blind matriarch, a lothario son, and an oddball butler (played by Telly Savalas, who is having a blast here, and that fun goes both ways, in my opinion). Mind you, then there are hints that there’s another person…and there are the ventriloquist dummies that Savalas has been carrying around…and then, of course, there’s that fresco that opens the film, with a portrait of the devil that looks oddly a whole like Savalas – and honestly, that’s not even the half of what’s going on here. Indeed, what is going on here is a bit hard to pin down, and I say that as someone who liked the movie quite a bit. The whole film unfolds like a waking nightmare, filled with dual identities, sliding senses of reality, and a sense that what’s going on is just out of reach – and yet, somehow it never quite comes together into something perfectly understandable. That doesn’t really hurt the film, though, not when it builds a mood like this that’s so eerie, and delivers such strong sequences here as an empty plane ride or a kiss that changes its nature halfway through. This sort of psychological horror – a la Repulsion or Sarah Langan’s novel Audrey’s Door – is so much my jam, and this one is done exceptionally well. And seriously, Savalas is a joy to watch here. Rating: **** ½

Similarly incoherent, but far less effectively, is Five Dolls for an August Moon, a movie that Bava came onto without much time to change the script to his liking, and instead found himself adding style upon style to cover up for a pretty unintelligible bit of storytelling that’s most definitely an uncredited riff on Agatha Christie’s And Then There Were None. That plot – which involves a series of couples on an isolated island, some scheming for an industrial formula that serves as the MacGuffin, and an increasingly large stash of dead bodies – never makes a damned bit of sense, and often relies on a lot of irrational and unclear actions. And yet, Bava makes so many interesting, fun, and weird choices that Five Dolls stays pretty fun throughout, even while it’s an undeniable mess. Opening with a faux Satanic ritual (which, in hindsight, doesn’t have a thing to do with the story and really doesn’t make any sense), Bava films the whole thing with dazzling colors and a constantly present swanky, mod music score that adds a wonderful vibe to it all. More than that, some of the small choices along the way (my favorite is the jaunty score beat that hits every time another body is added to the absurdly crowded freezer, a joke that gets funnier every time it happens) give Five Dolls way more personality and energy than the story itself deserves or brings to the table. In short, it’s not a very good movie, per se, but I had a lot of fun watching it. Rating: *** ½

Finally, time for one of Bava’s most famous works: Black Sabbath, an anthology of three short horror tales, nominally adapted from stories by Tolstoy, Chekhov, and de Maupassant, and all hosted by Boris Karloff (who also features in the longest story). As with any anthology, the quality ranges, but in general, the further into Black Sabbath you get, the better the short. The opener, “The Telephone,” is the story of a call girl being tormented by threatening phone calls, and her eventual reaching out to her former girlfriend for help (reminding me of the unexpected but pleasant thing about a lot of 70s Italian horror: just a casual, tacit acceptance of queer relationships); the story is fine, I suppose, but doesn’t really bring a lot to the table, and the ending is a deflation and a half. (The story is probably more notable for what it led to; according to a lot of film critics and scholars, “The Telephone” is the birth of what would become giallo films.) The second story, “The Wurdalak,” a 19th century Russian story about a sort of vampire, is a big step up; while it’s not out and out terrifying, its gothic style allows Bava more freedom for style and composition, and throwing in Karloff in a key role doesn’t hurt either. The story is a little too long, but there are a couple of brilliant sequences, with maybe the most chilling involving little more than a boy in a courtyard outside a window. But the reason to watch Black Sabbath is the final tale, “A Drop of Water,” which follows a doctor who takes a ring off of the corpse of a countess who died alone. What unfolds from there is really pure “get under your skin” unease for the longest time, as Bava wrings tension and anxiety out of little more than lighting and water drops, turning the screws until you can barely handle it – despite the fact that so little is happening – until, all of the sudden, they very much are happening, delivering some genuinely unnerving imagery and a solid ending. If “A Drop of Water” were the whole movie, I’d be raving about a horror classic; as it stands, you have a mixed bag, but the good outweighs the bad nicely. Rating: ****

IMDb: Lisa and the Devil | Five Dolls for an August Moon | Black Sabbath

A Little Horror Fest for Myself (Part 2)

I spent a week in Tampa recently, doing the AP Language exam essay grading – which basically meant that I spent eight hours a day straight reading essays, for seven days in a row. As a result, my reading basically went to zero for a week – shockingly, my brain was a little fried by the time I got back to the hotel! – and I used the solo downtime as a chance to watch some horror movies, making a little weeklong festival for myself. So, without further ado, here’s a rundown of the second half of the movies I watched…


I’ve really enjoyed all three previous features by Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead, a pair of independent filmmakers whose love of genre-bending entertainment allows them to throw together deeply unexpected elements – Lovecraftian monster meets Before Sunrise, sibling rivalry meets purgatorial cycles, etc. – into wholly unique films. But everyone is due for a miss along the way, and while Synchronic, the duo’s fourth film and their biggest budget/most mainstream release to date, isn’t a complete failure, it doesn’t quite live up to the standards of the other three movies. The premise is intriguing as anything, as a pair of New Orleans paramedics start dealing with the aftermath of a drug whose effects are truly surreal and inexplicable, only to find their own lives necessitating a dive into that drug to save the daughter of one of the men. It’s a lean, fun premise, and once the effects of the drug are seen, Benson and Moorhead use their budget well, creating wild worlds and visions that punch far above their weight class. The problem, ultimately, is that the thematic complexity the pair have always brought to their films doesn’t hold together here. Resolution was a film about the difficulties of endings in horror, serving as a meta meditation on storytelling; The Endless struggled with feeling trapped in your life and feeling the repetition of every day without hope of change. There’s no larger ideas in Synchronic to really grab onto, though – or, if they are, they’re not done with enough specificity to make the plot really sing out. It’s a fun watch, to be sure, and it’s done with style, but it definitely is the least of the duo’s efforts to date. Rating: *** ½


I’d been told again and again just how wild and insane the 2019 Brazilian film Bacurau was, so the fact that what I got was essentially a pretty entertaining and off-kilter Western probably ended up making me feel a little let down by the experience. But that’s really not the fault of the film, which kicks off with a doctor returning home to her small village for the funeral of the town’s matriarch, and ends with a gleefully entertaining Udo Kier and a group of henchmen (more or less) taking on the village in a violent showdown for the ages. The result is a film that sort of slides between genres as it sees fit, opening as a sort of quiet international drama filled with odd touches (my favorite is the DJ who seems to be on hand to announce all events in the town, although the constant use of hallucinogenics in the town is probably a close second) only to become something a bit weirder (albeit maybe not as weird as you’re going to think) and definitely more genre-oriented. It does all this, though, while also being a film about colonialism and Western feelings about countries like Brazil, making those points clearly and strongly while never shirking from its genre payoffs. It doesn’t hurt that Kier hasn’t been this fun in a long time; he’s having a blast in his part, and given how much of the film needs that role to work, that’s very important – especially since he could easily have coasted on just being, you know, Udo Kier. Don’t get your hopes up for some surreal genre explosion like Save the Green Planet! or something like that, as you may end up disappointed, but if you’re up for a nicely idiosyncratic, oddball Western with personality and novelty to spare, you’ll have a lot of fun here. Rating: ****


The Case of the Bloody Iris (known in its original Italian under the glorious title, What Are Those Strange Drops of Blood Doing on Jennifer’s Body?) is maybe one of the purest examples I’ve seen to date of the giallo genre – and in that, it’s also one of the most consistently entertaining and solid examples I’ve watched. In some ways, in face, Iris almost feels like a standard slasher thriller: a series of models in an apartment building keep winding up dead, and the obvious suspect (the omnipresent giallo actor, George Hilton) keeps turning up in ways that point to his culpability. Meanwhile, our heroine, Jennifer (the queen of giallo, Edwige Fenech) is dealing with her own trauma from her time in a free love cult, which adds sexual threat to the already physical threat around her. In other words, you have all the elements of the genre here – and does the killer wear gloves? Do you have to ask? But it’s all done with great tension and a winning sense of dry humor about itself, down to the comic relief police inspector who legitimately made me laugh often, and not at the movie but with it. As ever with Italian horror, the dubbing is odd, human behavior is a bit off kilter, and every woman is sexualized and then some, but all of that is part and parcel with the genre at this point. But as someone who is only gradually coming to embrace the giallo genre, Iris really worked for me – it’s entertaining, it’s solidly made, it’s suspenseful, and it’s all done with a sense of fun and oddness (the first cult flashback made me laugh out loud in its excess). It’s maybe the most archetypal giallo I’ve seen to date, but it’s also one of the most entertaining. Rating: ****


Tongue-in-cheek “bad” movies are among the hardest movies to get right for me. So often, they lean into the cheese too hard, turning everything into a bad skit instead of something genuinely funny and engaging. There are exceptions – Black Dynamite is maybe the most obvious offhand – but more often than not, self-aware “bad” movies just leave me irritated more than entertained. Such is the case with Psycho Goreman, an R-rated mix of Power Rangers and oddball 80s monster movie that never quite worked for me as much as I wished it did. The premise isn’t a bad one – two young kids unearth an ancient evil and get control over it, only for the being – now renamed Psycho Goreman because it sounds cool – to push against its reins, often with gory, excessive results. At its best moments, Psycho Goreman finds the perfect balance of broad 80s family comedy and insane violence, whether that’s the slow escape of one of Goreman’s henchpeople, a desperate cry for help, or a fun musical montage accompanied by a couple of demonstrations of Goreman’s power. But too often, I found myself more irritated by the movie’s fake tone, getting the joke that it was going for but just finding it one note and tiring. I’m in a minority here, so your mileage may vary; for me, though, a couple of inspired moments aside (that cry for help really did kill me), it just didn’t do much for me. Rating: ***


IMDb: Synchronic | Bacurau | The Case of the Bloody Iris | Psycho Goreman

An Italian Horror Triptych / ****

Thanks to the influence of my friend Ryan, I’ve been diving more and more into 70s Italian horror, both in general terms and, more specifically, into the giallo genre. Along the way, I’ve found a lot of films that I really love – Lucio Fulci won me over with Zombi and The Beyond, I’ve started to finally get onto the wavelength of Dario Argento, and my first glimpses of Mario Bava have been positive ones. Even so, I often find myself struggling to write reviews of giallo films, if only because there are so many elements that are essential to a good entry in the genre – a black-gloved killer, a dream-like logic, the murdering of beautiful women, either a man blamed for the killings or a woman drawn into a(n often psychosexual) mystery – recur in the best films. As a result, I often find myself struggling to find something new to say about the ones that I’ve seen; even when the individual films are different from each other, they have a tendency to run together.

Such really isn’t the case for the pairing of What Have You Done to Solange? and The Strange Vice of Mrs. Wardh, two essential entries in the genre that nonetheless are so markedly different that they merit some discussion as to the various ways that you can push giallo into something different. Despite being less than a year apart, Solange and Wardh show that giallo is far more than just the sum of its elements, instead allowing directors to take the basic story in a wide variety of directions.

Take Wardh, which in many ways, feels like your archetypal giallo (it’s essential enough that in retrospective, several jokes from The Editor make more sense to me after seeing it). You have a diplomat’s wife, torn between men – her husband, a new lover, an ex who reeks of danger – and finds herself at the crux of a slew of brutal murders. Typical giallo fare, but director Sergio Martino taps into the surrealism and dreamy atmosphere that can set films like these apart, giving us a glimpse into the rapidly fracturing world of (the always upsettingly gorgeous) Edwige Fenech’s unfaithful wife. Wardh‘s plot is beyond convoluted (I think the solution somehow works, but it’s definitely a wild one), but that’s really not the draw here – what works is Martino’s atmosphere, which set the tone for so much of the genre to come. A sexually charged atmosphere, beautiful visuals, inventively stylized killings, a focus on psychological torment over jump scares, the undeniable objectification of women despite being focused on female characters – all of that and more finds an early, iconic formation here, and you can feel its shadow over a lot of what I’ve seen “since” then.

Meanwhile, Solange is from close to the same time – one year earlier – and yet feels like an entirely different film. Yes, you have the gloved killer, the preying on women, the focus on characters’ guilt and psychology, the lurid atmosphere – all of what you think of as belonging to the genre. But Solange, for all of its uncomfortable subject matter (the main character is a teacher who’s accused of the murdering of female students – partially because he’s definitely having an affair with one, something the film doesn’t really seem to have too much of an issue with), feels less like a stylized slasher and almost more like a procedural. For all the grimness of the crimes – and they’re genuinely horrifying – there’s a focus on the motive behind them that gialli don’t often have, with a strong focus on how we got here and what led us to this point. There are plenty of other elements here, of course – as mentioned, this is a prime example of the “man accused of the crimes works to clear his name” part of the genre – but Solange feels almost like the “serious” film that led to the more exploitative films to come.

That’s not to say that Solange isn’t exploitative, lurid, or thoroughly a thriller; it’s just that it takes itself a little more seriously and seems to work as much as a crime film as it does an entry in this odd Italian subgenre. And watching it back to back with The Strange Vice of Mrs. Wardh makes for a compelling experiment in how two films of the same genre could be so different from each other, despite having so much in common. Indeed, that very contrast is what made the double feature so successful in the end.

Of course, there’s more to Italian horror than giallo – for many people, the first introduction to that world comes in the form of Dario Argento’s Suspiria. It took me a long time to get onto Suspiria‘s wavelength – to realize that Argento could care less about plot, and instead works entirely in a dreamlike, odd way that focuses more on style, setpieces, and the odd sense that the story both works on a primal level and yet doesn’t make any sense at all. If you can get into that state of mind – that is, realizing how little story matters here – you’ll probably enjoy Inferno, Argento’s semi-sequel to Suspiria that finds him creating a mythology about “three mothers” who have made their homes around the world, and this time diving into a New York apartment building which may be the local hub for evil activity.

In general, Inferno takes everything that Suspiria did and tries to crank it up further – more story, more style, more characters, more locations, and so forth. The result lacks some of the tightness and effectiveness of its predecessor, but that doesn’t really make it any less stylish or entertaining. By the time we’re in the apocalyptic finale complete with synth-rock Latin chanting, you know what you’re in for, and you can either accept it or just bail. Inferno isn’t among Argento’s best works, but it’s got a ton of great setpieces, including a long underwater stretch that works in its simplicity, that aforementioned finale, an eerie encounter in a classroom, and more. It’s not the best entry point into Italian horror – and really, it’s not quite as fun as Lumberto Bava’s Demons, which I recently watched – but it’s still a good time.

IMDb: The Strange Vice of Mrs. Wardh | What Have You Done to Solange? | Inferno

Horror Film Roundup: Curse of the Demon / Demons / Burn, Witch, Burn

Famously, Jacques Tourneur wanted to never show the titular demon of Curse of the Demon, instead wanting his tale of a skeptical professor investigating a devil-worshipping cult to earn its scares entirely through mood and implication; meanwhile, the studio disagreed and forced some visuals of the demon into the film, including one coming within minutes of the film beginning. It’s easy to say that Tourneur was right here; even if the demon wasn’t a bit goofy looking (and it is), those shots feel like they defuse some of the tension that Tourneur is so capable of making throughout the film, from the unease of hotel hallways to a tense meeting with some villagers. But Curse of the Demon is good enough that those shots can’t ruin the film at all (although having one at the film’s onset definitely robs the film of the ambiguity that it’s going for). It helps that the performances are so good, especially Niall MacGinnis as the smug, nicely sinister head of the cult, who brings just the right amount of hamminess to the role, all while making him feel like a genuinely dangerous man. In general, Curse of the Demon is a treat – a moody, unsettling little piece of classic horror whose atmosphere and filmcraft are so strong that they can’t be undone by some studio meddling that weakens it all a little bit. Rating: **** ½


I’m not going to sit here and tell you that Lumberto Bava’s Demons is a good movie. That’s not to say that it’s bad, but this is a trashy, goofy little piece of Italian horror full of gore, the requisite iffy dubbing, and a plot that basically functions enough to hold everything together more or less. But that doesn’t really matter, because what Bava does have going for him is a sense of ghoulish fun and kinetic energy that makes Demons a really fun watch. It doesn’t hurt that the film has a great hook, which involves a movie about demons whose events start being mirrored by events in the theater itself, leading to some nicely meta setpieces and some creative staging. Nor does it hurt things that Bava is completely capable of some nice images here – the moment in the film that inspires the poster art to the right is a genuinely great shot, eerie in its simplicity and starkness, and he knows how to delay the horror payoffs of a given scene until the perfect moment. As it goes along, Demons gets pretty absurd and silly, turning into a zombie movie before going to some wonderfully goofy places, but it always feels like Bava is a little in on the joke, and wants to deliver a movie that’s genuinely fun and enjoyable. And while the movie itself may not be perfect, especially when it comes to the back half (or when it comes to some of Bava’s choices in complicated sequences, when it can become impossible to track who is where), it definitely delivered the entertainment I was hoping for. Rating: ****


Based on a story by Fritz Leiber, written by Charles Beaumont and Richard Matheson (two of the biggest powerhouses of The Twilight Zone, and brought to you through the hands of AIP and Samuel Z. Arkoff, Burn, Witch, Burn (originally titled Night of the Eagle except in America, where we also added a gloriously silly prologue involving the solemn intonation of prayers to protect the audience) certainly has a heck of a pedigree. And by and the large, the film lives up to that, delivering something that’s more akin to something like Curse of the Demon than a Roger Corman special. Like Demon, Burn, Witch, Burn is about a skeptical college professor who discovers that his wife seems to be a witch casting spells to help him succeed. Of course, we’ve already seen the wife find something that looks like a poppet placed by someone else in the house, so what if all this is true? What unfolds from there is both much weirder than you expect and also about what you might guess (it’s beyond obvious who the villain is, but to be fair, I don’t think the film is entirely trying to hide it), as our professor finds his life unraveling and everything coming apart around him. Director Sidney Hayers does some odd filmmaking choices, with some uncomfortable closeups and odd framing, but it all works, especially during some fantastic setpieces (there’s a frantic midnight deadline that worked beautifully, but the ending is the obvious showcase) and a constant sense of weirdness that you can’t really shake. The acting is all solid, but the standout is Margaret Johnson as a limping, smiling faculty wife who mixes British politeness with obvious scorn, bringing a lot of personality and weirdness to what could be a one-note role. Burn, Witch, Burn can’t help but pale a little bit thanks to watching it the day after Demon, but it’s still a solid little gem that deserves a little more attention than it seems to have gotten. Rating: ****


IMDb: Curse of the Demon | Demons | Burn, Witch, Burn

The Hunger / All the Colors of the Dark / Evilspeak

One of my favorite local hangouts is Full Moon Cineplex, a locally-run theater that runs cult and horror movies most weekends. Sometimes you get them odd stone-cold classic, but mostly, FMC specializes in enjoyable horror trash and forgotten oddities. I don’t often write up what I see there unless it really stands out, but this weekend, I felt like giving a quick roundup of some recent watches out there.

THE-HUNGER.jpgI was really hoping the second time would be the charm for Tony Scott’s cult vampire flick The Hunger, which stars Catherine Deneuve and David Bowie as ancient vampires and Susan Sarandon as the age-studying scientist who falls into their orbit. And to be fair, the film opens at its best, delivering style in excess and letting Deneuve and Bowie’s iconic beauties carry the weight of their vampiric thrall, as well as introducing a genuinely interesting question into a vampire film: what would happen if you did begin to age, even in your immortality? It’s all a promising start, but The Hunger turns out to have basically no interest in any of the novel ideas it brings up. Instead, the film becomes turgid and drawn-out, stretching what little plot it has to tedious length before concluding with a finale that makes little sense even before the studio-mandated epilogue. It’s all stylish as anything, of course, and that cast is incapable of being anything less than compulsively watchable. But it ends up being the kind of movie that would be better on mute on the screens of a club than it is to watch. Rating: **

colors.jpgSpeaking of rewatches: I had honestly forgotten that I had already seen (and apparently disliked) All the Colors of the Dark, a giallo with a devoted following, but I’m very glad I did, because I found the experience a lot more compelling and effective this time. Yes, All the Colors is still bonkers, even by standards of the genre, opening with a dream sequence that’s off-kilter, aggressively surreal, and utterly bewildering. But the film tones that down as it goes along, turning its story into a giallo variation on Repulsion, as our heroine is stalked by a blue-eyed killer who may or may not be real, finds herself drawn into a satanic cult, and so much more. Director Sergio Martino films the whole thing in a style that feels like, in the words of one reviewer I saw, like “Hitchcock dosed with LSD,” and Edwige Fenech brings a fragile beauty to it all that makes the character work. It’s an undeniably surreal work, trying to evoke a nightmare, but it somehow achieves its purpose, giving you something memorable and haunting even while delivering some B-movie feelings and general insanity. Well worth a watch, and I’m glad I forgot about my previous feelings and went in fresh. Rating: ****

evilsspeak.jpgFinally, it’a going to be hard to give a truly objective review to Evilspeak, a Z-level 80s horror film starring Clint Howard as a picked-on kid at a military school who turns to the writings of a Satanic monk to get his revenge. (As one does.) Evilspeak is a mess and a half, feeling less like a script and more like a collection of scenes on note cards shuffled into a deck and thrown onto the screen just to get to the ending of the film. And Clint Howard is, well, Clint Howard; no matter how many pratfalls he makes, no matter how much he’s bullied, you can’t help but think, well, I don’t even bully people and I kind of want to bully this kid. And yet, somewhere along the way I embraced the insanity (Stockholm Syndrome, maybe?) and just found myself in awe of what I was watching, from Satanic messages on monochrome computer screens to glorious Latin chanting of Spanish monk names to actors who could be said to be chewing the scenery if you wanted to undersell it all. But then Evilspeak gets to its climax, in which a Satan-possessed Clint Howard flies around a room with a sword and an army of feral hogs, slaughtering everyone in sight. It’s a genuinely spectacular climax in its commitment to the bit, and while it’s not really “scary” in any sense, it sure is entertaining as hell. (And admittedly, the climax does feature one genuinely unnerving effect involving a crucifix.) I certainly wouldn’t recommend watching Evilspeak in any traditional sense of the word “recommend”, but it’s a pretty wonderful piece of trashy 80s horror, one that knows what it is and what it can do and just delivers to the best of its ability. And honestly, if “hovering Clint Howard slaughtering his foes with the support of vicious pigs” doesn’t sell you on it, I don’t know what to tell you. Rating: *** (which represents my best effort at averaging the movie’s entertainment value with its quality)

IMDb: The Hunger | All the Colors of the Dark | Evilspeak

Cemetery Man / ****

51xy1qd0u2lOne of my maxims of moviegoing is that I would always rather see an interesting failure than a boring success – in other words, I would rather see a film that experiments and pushes the envelope than something that plays it safe but does nothing new. It’s a rule that undeniably comes into play in Cemetery Man, which feels like one of those movies in which the filmmakers tossed in every single idea they had just in case they never got to make anything else, and yet is so entertaining and fun that it’s hard to complain too much.

It certainly doesn’t hurt that, for all of its horror elements – this is, after all, a story about a man who lives in a cemetery where part of his duties include dispatching the dead when they arise as zombies – Cemetery Man mixes in liberal amounts of comedy, bits of melodrama, and a whole lot of surreal weirdness, giving you a film that’s nothing if not unpredictable. The early going, with its slightly overbearing narration so focused on a life surrounded by death, might lead you wondering where the fun of this is going to be, but by the time the film features a ludicrous car accident that leads to a) an absurdly violent death, b) an equally ridiculous escalation that involves a busful of children and nuns exploding, and c) a reaction shot by a horse, you’ll realize that Cemetery Man is about to go for broke and never really look back.

Director Michele Soavi was an acolyte of Dario Argento, and it shows in the film’s sumptuous, shadowy style and sharp eye, which give us a film that often sneaks up on you with its artful, occasionally over the top shot composition. But while Argento often had just enough plot to string together a few great sequences, Soavi’s film has the opposite problem, tossing out so much plot that it’s easy to forget what all is going on. By the time there’s a supremely unlikely romance going on in the basement while our hero is still pining over his (once alive, then dead, then alive, then) dead girlfriend as the police are wondering if he’s randomly murdering civilians in the town, all while a motorcycle-riding zombie is being chased after by his secret girlfriend…well, you just sort of give yourself over to the chaos and let it all wash over you.

The result, however overly ambitious it might be, is never less than massively entertaining. Indulging in surreal silliness delivered in a matter-of-fact style, doling out gallons of blood and absurd gore shots, veering into art-film territory before becoming a broad comedy, Cemetery Man is so much fun that you can’t fault it for doing too much – after all, if it didn’t do all of these things, and do them generally well, the film wouldn’t stand out as much as it does. It doesn’t hurt that you have some truly fun performances here; it’s almost a shock that Rupert Everett is as drily witty as he is here, but the real scene-stealer is François Hadji-Lazaro as Everett’s somewhat mute, possibly brain damaged henchman/friend/companion/lackey. Bringing a cheerful positivity and a love of stray leaves to every scene, Hadji-Lazaro wonderfully odd performance makes a sharp contrast to Everett’s mopey, death-obsessed hero, and gives the film the chance to indulge in its weirdness while not making its protagonist act out of character.

It’s really no wonder that Cemetery Man became a cult classic; it’s too scattered and all over the place to become a mainstream hit (even without its bizarrely metaphorical, Italian art-film ending), but its blend of wildly clashing tones, splattery sensibility, and dark sense of humor all but guaranteed that it would attract passionate fans who latched onto its uniqueness. It’s not like anything else out there, it’s fun, it’s weird, it’s gory – what else do you need?

IMDb

Suspiria / **** ½

suspiria-previous-design-2It’s taken me a long time to come around on Suspiria. The first time I saw it, probably 15+ years ago, I saw it knowing only that it was hailed as an essential and classic horror movie. What I got was bewildering to me; stylish and colorful, sure, but also nonsensical, unclear, and just sort of a mess. Then, a few years ago, I decided to give it another shot, seeing it on the big screen, to see if maybe I just had a bad first experience…but this time, a butchered and neutered print left me even colder to it, not really understanding any of the appeal of the film. To me, Suspiria’s popularity was bewildering; the script was a mess, the sequences often incomprehensible, the acting off-kilter…I just couldn’t get it.

But over the past couple of years, I’ve finally started to understand Italian horror – the style, the emphasis of mood and mise-en-scene over story, the focus on surreal and nightmarish imagery more than script or acting. It started for me with Lucio Fulci films, but there have been others along the way, including some more exposure to Argento. And so, I decided it was time to revisit Suspiria one more time, if I could find the right chance. So when the Belcourt theater in Nashville announced that they’d be screening the new 4k, uncut restoration of the film on the big screen, it seemed like the perfect chance.

And, man, am I ever glad I went.

There’s no denying that being more attuned to the rhythms of Italian horror had a huge impact on my viewing this time, as did realizing exactly how much – and how little – story I was going to get with Suspiria. Because, make no mistake, this is a thin, thin movie, in which a ballerina attends a school run by witches, and creepy things happen. That’s about all there is to Suspiria in terms of plotting, and yet, seeing the film in its full, uncut, restored glory, it’s hard not to get swept up in the nightmarish, intense setpieces. From a haunting pursuit that ends with creative use of a stained glass window to a blind man being attacked by his own guide dog, Suspiria shows off Argento’s knack for staging a sequence, and if it doesn’t always stand on the logic of the film or entirely make sense of its own accord, well, you’re certainly not thinking about that while you’re watching it.

But more than that, the colors – my god, the colors. Seeing Suspiria not just in a pristine  restoration, but in a restoration that made every single super-saturated color nearly pop out of the screen…well, it was a jaw-dropping way to see the film, one that frequently left me speechless at the imagery on display. It’s the ideal way to see – and to appreciate – Suspiria, a film that almost entirely relies on its ability to sweep you up in its saturated, hypnotic, strange world. (Mind you, the iconic score by Goblin does no small amount of work here, creating a strange, off-kilter mood that’s impossible to shake. It’s a bizarre, atypical score for a bizarre, atypical movie, but man, do they ever work well together.)

There are always going to be things about Suspiria that just don’t work for me. Even knowing how loose and shaggy the story is, there are big chunks of the movie that just feel silly and nonsensical, stretching the already tolerant boundaries of Italian horror to their breaking points. That’s probably most true in the film’s climax, a truly jumbled set of moments that feel like nothing so much as the film running out of time and hurriedly wrapping itself up so it could beat traffic. And even with the unbelievable style on display, part of me prefers the sleazy, go-for-broke horror of Fulci to Argento’s controlled, beautiful death.

But for the first time, this screening helped me understand what everyone loves about Suspiria.  It left me in awe of the iconic death sequences, unsettled by some of the intense mood setting, and absolutely floored by the beauty of the compositions. And more than that, it finally helped the film fall into focus not just as a niche art thing, but as a unique and fascinating piece of horror unlike most anything else. It’s beautifully, intricately composed, worried entirely about its visuals over its story (and even its scares), and absolutely, carefully controlled in its craft. And as someone who so often loves horror but finds the craft lacking, that’s no small thing.

IMDb

Mario Bava Double Feature

Even with my recent embrace of Italian horror, one of the big holes in my film knowledge has been the works of Mario Bava, who’s held up as one of the Big Three directors of the genre (the others being Dario Argento and Lucio Fulci). So when the Belcourt offered up a double feature of Bava films, it seemed like a no-brainer for me to knock out two of his films with one shot.

511qbkdvwelThat being said, despite its fame, Black Sunday may not have been the one to start with. Make no mistake: Black Sunday is beautifully shot, embracing the gothic nature of its story (which involves the resurrection of a medieval witch who wants vengeance on the family that killed her originally) and then some, using its black and white cinematography to incredible effect, and giving out some beautiful framing that I was in awe of. Yes, Black Sunday undeniably showed me the style that Bava brought to bear, and gave me a sense of what he would do once he threw color into his palette of tools. But as a horror film, Black Sunday moves at a snail’s pace, feeling far longer than its 87-minute running time might suggest. There are some incredible moments, and a (somewhat) surprising amount of gore, all done with style to spare and a gloriously gothic mood that you know I’m up for (I am, historically, very pro Gothic films). But from a story point of view, it’s a drag, stretching out every reveal to a point of tedium, and overexplaining every moment (at least in the English dub that I saw; perhaps the original Italian version is stronger there). Still, if you can get past that, there’s little denying the beauty of the film on display, nor the obvious talent behind the camera. It’s just the pacing that drags it down. Rating: ***

blood-and-black-lace-movie-poster-1965-1020436027

Luckily, though, the next film was all I hoped for and then some. Often held to be the origin of the giallo genre, Bava’s Blood and Black Lace is a blast from its opening moments (a gloriously stylish set of posed opening credits that finds every actor striking a pulp noir cover pose next to their name), and that holds true through to the end. The film is pure giallo, with its gloved, behatted figure murdering (mostly) beautiful woman in stylish ways, for reasons that only sort of make sense by the film’s end. Not that that really matters; for all of its soap opera plotting, Blood and Black Lace is an exercise in style – and what style it is. Adding color into his toolbox, Bava delivers an incredible experience, with the standout being a thrilling sequence set against the backdrop of blinking green lights that give us only glimpses of the killer stalking his prey. Yes, Blood and Black Lace spends a bit more time on its labyrinthine story than the typical giallo film (complete with some gloriously soapy confrontations), and that definitely results in a few draggy sections along the way; that being said, the horror elements are so good – tense, sure, but also executed with such style and visual craft – that you’ll find yourself forgiving the film for any shortcomings.  Rating: ****

IMDb: Black Sunday | Blood and Black Lace